PDA

View Full Version : UGLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Firebird67dude
12-02-2005, 12:17 PM
http://www.supercars.net/Pics?viewPic=y&source=car&id=1464&p=2000_pontiac_firebird_hurst_hauler-1.jpg&y=2000&m=Pontiac&o=Firebird%20Hurst%20Hauler%20Concept
12secondv6
12-02-2005, 12:41 PM
Not bad.... its different
Untamed
12-02-2005, 12:58 PM
Looks clean, though I wouldn't want it.

In the January issue of High Performance Pontiac they show a 68 GTO station wagon. While Im not one for station wagons, its real clean as if it should have been an option for GTOs.
Teds89IROC
12-02-2005, 01:03 PM
hmm, when I die I wanna be carried away in it :lol:

~Ted
qwikz28
12-02-2005, 01:23 PM
i like it
PBodyGT87
12-02-2005, 01:24 PM
"NEW! The Firebird for Truely Super Soccer Moms!"
PA SS
12-02-2005, 01:31 PM
Don't like it.

I do like this one, which I saw at Englishtown recently.

http://Bubba.smugmug.com/photos/42046621-M.jpg
ar0ck
12-02-2005, 02:10 PM
Its a Kamelback, theirs one for every generation Firebird. Old News.
enRo
12-02-2005, 02:12 PM
Looks like a Firebird screwed an Escort Wagon and wualla.
camaroracer1992
12-02-2005, 02:29 PM
hte hurst hauler rocks, i have the poster with it and Linda Vaughn on it, for an older chick in her 60's she still has a rocking body!!
Brando56894
12-02-2005, 02:32 PM
hmm, when I die I wanna be carried away in it :lol:

~Ted

i second that
NJSPEEDER
12-02-2005, 03:23 PM
i saw one of the real ones when they were first shopping it around. concept was actually developed by an aftermarket company then shopped to GM.
the premise of a high performance wagon is cool, but why an f-body?
the proportion of the rear of the thing is what throws me off. it looks like the rear wheels needs to move back about 8inches to have the body lines flow correctly.
nj85z28
12-02-2005, 03:56 PM
eh, ive seen worse
jims69camaro
12-02-2005, 04:15 PM
Looks like a Firebird screwed an Escort Wagon and wualla.

what's a wualla?

i had seen that wagon before. i'm typically not a fan of wagons, but i do like the nomad and this hurst hauler. they're different.
Ian
12-02-2005, 05:35 PM
what's a wualla?

he meant "viola"...I think thats how its spelled.
Savage_Messiah
12-02-2005, 05:50 PM
no more like walla... "wall - ahh"....
Ian
12-02-2005, 05:54 PM
vwalla?
Savage_Messiah
12-02-2005, 06:13 PM
yea thats close
PBodyGT87
12-03-2005, 01:33 AM
he meant "viola"...I think thats how its spelled.

actually you were close. but its voila.

a viola is an string instrument. you just switched the letters that all. but by phonetics people say vwa-la, or the more slang way, wah-lah.
Savage_Messiah
12-03-2005, 02:13 AM
actually you were close. but its voila.

a viola is an string instrument

yea I was cracking up for a minute when I read that cuz I pictured noah with a viola saying "voila!"... dk, funny mental image
BigAls87Z28
12-03-2005, 02:33 AM
A Firebird....Maxx?
enRo
12-03-2005, 10:05 AM
I have no further comment on this thread.....
Savage_Messiah
12-03-2005, 01:20 PM
hmm, when I die I wanna be carried away in it :lol:

~Ted

:stupid:
jims69camaro
12-03-2005, 03:55 PM
I have no further comment on this thread.....

thanks for clearing that up for me...

kudos to liz for getting it right.
Brando56894
12-03-2005, 05:58 PM
actually you were close. but its voila.

a viola is an string instrument. you just switched the letters that all. but by phonetics people say vwa-la, or the more slang way, wah-lah.

and here ends our lecture for today :-P