Log in

View Full Version : the Next GTO (teaser)


Koll
07-28-2006, 04:54 AM
GM just released this image.

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/gallery/data/500/medium/GTOtease1.jpg

BonzoHansen
07-28-2006, 07:16 AM
Man, make the 2 door a camaro & firebird, and make a poor's man's cts-v for the gto (although I am sure the purists would cry about 4 doors).

shane27
07-28-2006, 07:22 AM
4 doors is :gay:

slugger27nj
07-28-2006, 07:40 AM
It would by nice if that was actually from GM, but that's just a GMI rendition of what they would like to see. I would like to see it, too (with only 2 doors of course).

Blackbirdws6
07-28-2006, 07:48 AM
where is everyone seeing 4-doors? did i miss something. Looks like it has potential. I'm probably looking to buy a new sports/muscle car and with all these new cars coming out....things are looking good.

-Brian

BonzoHansen
07-28-2006, 08:15 AM
4 doors is :gay:
Wait till you have a family…you can’t shove kids in the back of a Camaro. Not everyday.


The Cadillac CTS-V is a 4-door, that was my reference.

jola
07-28-2006, 08:44 AM
Well, it looks pretty good. I wouldn't be mad if they came out with a 4-door version, just definately keep a 2-door version too. Then everyone is happy.

Tsar
07-28-2006, 08:47 AM
Wait till you have a family…you can’t shove kids in the back of a Camaro. Not everyday.


The Cadillac CTS-V is a 4-door, that was my reference.
actually kids fir perfect in there.
however when our whole family goes out ( 3 peeps :lol:) my mom always sits in the back and me and my step dad sit in the front so i guess it would kinda suck.

LS1Hawk
07-28-2006, 08:48 AM
Well, it looks pretty good. I wouldn't be mad if they came out with a 4-door version, just definately keep a 2-door version too. Then everyone is happy.

Yeah, they could call the 4-door a Tempest and make the coupe a GTO. Bring back the names people know, not a letter followed by a number!

Untamed
07-28-2006, 08:48 AM
There was a Buick or an Olds that had a similar backend didn't it? That forward slope in the rear looks familiar.

LS1Hawk
07-28-2006, 08:57 AM
There was a Buick or an Olds that had a similar backend didn't it? That forward slope in the rear looks familiar.

Yes, the Olds Aurora had that kind of look

http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com//pictures/VEHICLE/1999/Oldsmobile/12571/008772-E.jpg

j0n
07-28-2006, 11:40 AM
eh...back end looks :gay:

qwikz28
07-28-2006, 11:42 AM
good job Koll. that is a photoshop and not a GM pic.

BonzoHansen
07-28-2006, 12:08 PM
actually kids fir perfect in there.
however when our whole family goes out ( 3 peeps :lol:) my mom always sits in the back and me and my step dad sit in the front so i guess it would kinda suck.

Yeah, I'll stand by my statment, maybe adding the word 'normal' family. :lol: Dragging kids in & out of the back of a 2 door is a PITA. Forget if it is an infant in a carry seat. And last I looked, unless you are a friggin midget, the fronts seats of an f-body almost touch the back seats. :laugh:

At best case scenario, the interior would take way too much abuse from all the climbing over the seats.

Come on GM, make me an affordable (sub $30k) LSx 6-speed CTS-V!

enRo
07-28-2006, 01:31 PM
70's 'Cuda much?

Koll
07-28-2006, 05:52 PM
I know its a rendering from GMI.
Hence the TEASER

BigAls87Z28
07-28-2006, 06:16 PM
Affordable Caddy...and a V model?
Maybe if you are used to spending 80k for a 500hp M5 or E55, a 50-60k CTS-V with 500hp would be more "affordable" but the only way you are gunna see a CTS-V for under 30k is a used one.
Now a 400hp RWD sedan for around 30k from another GM division...well... :)

BonzoHansen
07-28-2006, 06:32 PM
Affordable Caddy...and a V model?
Maybe if you are used to spending 80k for a 500hp M5 or E55, a 50-60k CTS-V with 500hp would be more "affordable" but the only way you are gunna see a CTS-V for under 30k is a used one.
Now a 400hp RWD sedan for around 30k from another GM division...well... :)
That is what I am saying!

Oddball
07-29-2006, 01:47 PM
Yeah, I'll stand by my statment, maybe adding the word 'normal' family. :lol: Dragging kids in & out of the back of a 2 door is a PITA. Forget if it is an infant in a carry seat. And last I looked, unless you are a friggin midget, the fronts seats of an f-body almost touch the back seats. :laugh:

At best case scenario, the interior would take way too much abuse from all the climbing over the seats.

Come on GM, make me an affordable (sub $30k) LSx 6-speed CTS-V!

When I would have the 5-point seats in the rear of the IROC I had the girls at day care laughing when I would have to take off the T-tops and lower the twins through the roof into the back seat.

I'm grown up now. Until the kids are bigger I need a 4-door car which is why my options are limited and why the Charger is my best option. I want a sedan that doesn't look like cheap GM car that can seat three kids safely in the back.

It is all about the buyer demographics. If I wanted to get into a d*ck size competition everytime I drove somewhere there are plenty of fast cars. But I need something that is more than just speed. I need utility as well. I'm not going to drop $25 - $35k on a daily driver my kids can't get in and out of.