View Full Version : Camaro delayed AGAIN!
GrandmasterCow
04-01-2008, 10:13 AM
Link : http://www.fbodyonline.com/f12/camaro-delayed-again-1666/#post13854
Today is April 1st... I don't believe 1 thing I read today!
JW :D
Demonicbird00
04-01-2008, 10:22 AM
let me think WOMP WOMP...... haha
Knipps
04-01-2008, 10:23 AM
Leftlanenews.com (http://www.elon.edu/images/e-web/pendulum/April-Fool-ILLUS.jpg)
**** you, you ****ing, ****
firebirdcrazy
04-01-2008, 10:24 AM
That is obviously fake
WildBillyT
04-01-2008, 10:25 AM
Today is April 1st... I don't believe 1 thing I read today!
JW :D
Agreed. 2011 or 2012 is way too far off.
jims69camaro
04-01-2008, 10:27 AM
w t f
jims69camaro
04-01-2008, 10:47 AM
:bs:
http://camaro5.com/forums/images/smilies/sm4.gif
procamaroz28
04-01-2008, 09:12 PM
eh not lookin foward to it anyways not sure if i like it
91DropTop
04-01-2008, 09:17 PM
i like the part about the diesel option HAHA no F'n WAY :moon:
BigAls87Z28
04-02-2008, 07:04 AM
i like the part about the diesel option HAHA no F'n WAY :moon:
Why not?
foff667
04-02-2008, 07:53 AM
They already announced early last month that it was being delayed until the 2010 model year and while the timing of that thread is a bit bad who knows? And with gas prices going as high as they are its not horribly silly to look into throwing a diesel motor into one even with diesel prices now a full dollar more than unleaded gas in most places it still might be economic for most just for the mpg gain. And think about having a camaro with 900ftlb of tq at 2000 rpms running the factory pcm and just a couple of bolt ons ;)
If it were up to me I'd consider the 4.5 diesel if it were offered :shrug:
jims69camaro
04-02-2008, 10:12 AM
They already announced early last month that it was being delayed until the 2010 model year and while the timing of that thread is a bit bad who knows? And with gas prices going as high as they are its not horribly silly to look into throwing a diesel motor into one even with diesel prices now a full dollar more than unleaded gas in most places it still might be economic for most just for the mpg gain. And think about having a camaro with 900ftlb of tq at 2000 rpms running the factory pcm and just a couple of bolt ons ;)
If it were up to me I'd consider the 4.5 diesel if it were offered :shrug:
Leftlanenews.com (http://www.leftlanenews.com)
foff667
04-02-2008, 11:03 AM
What am I supposed to be looking at on there Jim?
Knipps
04-02-2008, 12:17 PM
Leftlanenews.com (http://www.elon.edu/images/e-web/pendulum/April-Fool-ILLUS.jpg)
**** you, you ****ing, ****
Leftlanenews.com (http://www.leftlanenews.com)
What am I supposed to be looking at on there Jim?
Try my link instead of his, mine is copied from what was at the bottom of the article ;)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.