GM gets one last low blow at Pontiac

[BurninrubberGT]

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f14/meet-your-2010-pontiac-lineup-one-model-80511/

and the last pontiac made, will be a toyota..:-?

[Anti_Rice_Guy]

Why bother?

[sweetbmxrider]

fail

[Whiplash Performance]

Damnit. I thought maybe Pontiac would have came out with a special edition G8 or something with an LS7 in it to go out with a big bang!

[5.7TA]

Yeah that would have been sweet if they would have put an LS7 in a G8

[WildBillyT]

I don't give a **** what they do as long as they get to keep the lights on at GM

[BurninrubberGT]

forget the ls7, i want the g8 they put the lsx454 in

[Little G]

I'm so glad I was able to get a Sol when I did.

g

[Jam]

How the F^@# is GM going to BUILD EXCITEMENT with a Pontiac Vibe?.....

[madness410]

I don't give a **** what they do as long as they get to keep the lights on at GM

+1..

[Frosty]

I don't give a **** what they do as long as they get to keep the lights on at GM

How about the dealers they're ROYALLY ****ing over and forcing the "good" ones to sign ridiculous contracts.

Yay for government intervention. I hope the company crumbles and takes every tax payer dollar with them.

[WildBillyT]

How about the dealers they're ROYALLY ****ing over and forcing the "good" ones to sign ridiculous contracts.

Yay for government intervention. I hope the company crumbles and takes every tax payer dollar with them.

You make it sound like GM dealers are the only guys who have ever been ****ed hard in business. I'm very, very sorry to hear about the honest people who have lost their jobs but this type of thing happens every day in other industries.

[Frosty]

Yup, it does happen every day...however GM using the whole "gun to the head" tactics for the good dealers is ridiculous. It's basically an open ended contract on GM's side so they can change it whenever they want. Sorry but that's BS. There's also a no discussion clause, dealers can't talk to the media about it...I guess that's why the 2 sites that ran the story no longer have it up....interesting...what is GM so afraid of?

[WildBillyT]

Yup, it does happen every day...however GM using the whole "gun to the head" tactics for the good dealers is ridiculous. It's basically an open ended contract on GM's side so they can change it whenever they want. Sorry but that's BS. There's also a no discussion clause, dealers can't talk to the media about it...I guess that's why the 2 sites that ran the story no longer have it up....interesting...what is GM so afraid of?

Bad PR. Public image is everything for them now. If they get a worse rep than they already have they will be done for real.

I've signed documents for companies that forbid me to even hold casual conversation with members of the media and competitors. Not that unheard of.

[JerzyIroc]

How about the dealers they're ROYALLY ****ing over and forcing the "good" ones to sign ridiculous contracts.

Yay for government intervention. I hope the company crumbles and takes every tax payer dollar with them.

It definitely sucks. The whole GM situation is a hard one on tousands of people... But if it wasn't for gorvernment intervetion, there would probably be NO GM at all...

[Frosty]

Yup...and now they're in uncharted territory RUSHING private companies through bankruptcy...but that's ok because it's for a company we like...

You guys also know the administration is picking GM's entire board right?

[JerzyIroc]

Ya i heard something about that. Not sure if thats a good thing. I think in theory it could possibly be a good idea, but seeing it actually happen that way i guess we'll have to see. But overall im not to thrilled about that. As far as forcing them. I pretty torn on it. A part of me agrees with you that it was a bad idea to force them into it. I dont think a company should be forced into it. The other part of me feels it had to be done. The company was going in the wrong direction. It's hard to deny it. Of all; the company's that GM is dumping Pontiac is the hardest one to swallow. I think they could make it work but obviously thats not gonna happen. If this is what they feel they have to do then so be it. Id rather have a GM with only a few company's than no GM at all.

[Frosty]

The bigger picture is the the government is overstepping their power...the big picture is their power is growing in leaps and bounds.

But again, people seem to think it's ok since they're saving our beloved car company. More proof that people in this country have no spine and are nothing but sheep.(not saying you)

[Jam]

I agree with Frosty's take on this.
EDIT: oh wait.....does that make me :fluffy:a sheep

[LTb1ow]

The bigger picture is the the government is overstepping their power...the big picture is their power is growing in leaps and bounds.

But again, people seem to think it's ok since they're saving our beloved car company. More proof that people in this country have no spine and are nothing but sheep.(not saying you)

Yurp.

And if the public wanted nice cute cars, GM may have marketed them... heres to yuppie cars. :lol:

:rofl:

[NastyEllEssWon]

Hopefully we get one of these!!!! If so the Ion is getting traded in with ever so quickness!


http://www.autoclub.com.au/uploaded_images/chevrolet-lumina-ss-2007-798350.jpg

[BigAls87Z28]

Goverment wants no control over GM, but owning 60% of the company sure gives it the abiility to put people in place to get things done.
Trust me, GM's board was no great group of people. People going in there are not just random goverment officials, but high ranking officials of other companies such as AT&T and Coca Cola.
Its not that bad. President Obama does not want to control the car companies because he doesnt know how to run one.
You could right wing the crap out of it, but in the end we will have a better and stronger GM.

[BonzoHansen]

Goverment wants no control over GM,http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/SIBLY/Emos/bs.gif I'd like to think that, but I know it can;t happen.

Go see how bwaney fwanks called Fritz and 'asked' him not to close a distribution warehouse in mass.

[BigAls87Z28]

Time will tell.

[Frosty]

Goverment wants no control over GM, but owning 60% of the company sure gives it the abiility to put people in place to get things done.
Trust me, GM's board was no great group of people. People going in there are not just random goverment officials, but high ranking officials of other companies such as AT&T and Coca Cola.
Its not that bad. President Obama does not want to control the car companies because he doesnt know how to run one.
You could right wing the crap out of it, but in the end we will have a better and stronger GM.

So what flavor kool-aid is it today. ;)

I'd like to think they won't want to run things, I really really do. This isn't a "right wing" thing, this is a common sense thing and looking at the big picture. The idea of the government taking control of a private company is FAR bigger than just GM....it's WAY bigger than just GM. Like I said, since it's a company we all love it's A-OK. Sorry but it's not.

I hope and pray I'm wrong, I'm hope Obama stays true to his word, I hope idiots like Reed, Pelosi and slobber-monster Frank keep their traps shut...I hope the ENTIRE government(right and left) leave GM alone...but think about it Al...they control 60% of the company...they basically bought GM with OUR dime...you can't possibly think they won't pull strings...it's human nature...when humans see an opportunity to gain power they seize that opportunity. They did this all while having a green plan, all while having a plan for smaller cars, more efficient cars and saving the environment. Now, I'm not going to get into the global warming/fuel efficiency and where the auto industry should go debate but what could be better here? Hmmm...I want more fuel efficient vehicles on the road, I also want to save the polar bears...wait...we now control 60% of a car company... what's the BEST way to start accomplishing my plan? I KNOW!! The car company I now own. :rofl: Again, not debating the global warming thing but if you think for one second that the administration won't push their agenda you need to take your head out of the same. I'd say the same thing if it was the right pulling the strings. This is bigger than left vs. right too. BTW, that awesome AT&T guy was also the same guy that allowed Bush and company to wire tap his own customers AFTER AT&T's lawyers said no, it's illegal. Nothing like having a puppet with power.

I see way more opportunities for failure and government power than success and prosperity. Again I hope I'm wrong but what do I know...I'm just some crazy Conservative/Libertarian ;)

[BigAls87Z28]

Oh I know the temptation. There is always that temptation.
But unlike the banks, there has been tons of goverment regulation already in place, so its not as if the goverment needs to have total oversight and control as in the banks case.
I worry about it too, but I think that its a nessessary evil.

[Frosty]

Oh I know the temptation. There is always that temptation.
But unlike the banks, there has been tons of goverment regulation already in place, so its not as if the goverment needs to have total oversight and control as in the banks case.
I worry about it too, but I think that its a nessessary evil.

I agree to a point but the last part...the necessary evil is where we're fundamentally different. I just get really really worried any time government steps into the private sector, especially with some of the TARP games that are being played...call me a tin foil hat wearer but it worries me. The Constitution has been trampled on for the last few years and it's only getting worse.

[NastyEllEssWon]

i personally believe that the govt expects gm to tank. that way they can put a plan into place to offer super low cost BRAND NEW CARS once you scrap your old one....once the govt starts to auction of gm and dismantle it from the inside out.



the failure of gm is inevitable. the govt just wants to profit off it and get old cars off the road at the same time

[LS1Hawk]

People going in there are not just random goverment officials, but high ranking officials of other companies such as AT&T and Coca Cola.
Its not that bad. President Obama does not want to control the car companies because he doesnt know how to run one.

Neither does Ed Whitacre from AT&T. He publicly stated "I don't know anything about cars."

[BurninrubberGT]

Neither does Ed Whitacre from AT&T. He publicly stated "I don't know anything about cars."

a gm guy knowing nothing about cars....what else is new?

[BigAls87Z28]

Neither does Ed Whitacre from AT&T. He publicly stated "I don't know anything about cars."

Neither did Allan Mullaly. He came from a company that makes planes. But Mullaly, like Whitacre, comes form a very large company, one that is tops in thier game, and knows how to stay on top.
Fritz Henderson is still the CEO and President.
What Im more interested in, and what the focus will shift to after all this **** is over with, is who will take over for Bob Lutz now that Lutz is on his way out the door?
If GM comes out of this alive, and firing on all 8 cylinders, someone needs to keep carrying that same power and attention for vehicles like Lutz has in just about every company he has been in. Thats what worries me. If Lutz left today, in 3 short years we will have run out of all he had his hands on.
We need another Bob Lutz.

[LTb1ow]

BigAl for CEO?

[NastyEllEssWon]

BigAl for CEO?



http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/src:www.ls1tech.com/get/forums/images/smilies/nutswinger.gif



:rofl::rofl::rofl:

:wink:

[LS1Hawk]

Neither did Allan Mullaly. He came from a company that makes planes.

I cannot discredit Mullaly. He has definitely brought Ford a long way. Granted, they still have a long way to go, but they are finally on the right track with the new Fusion and Taurus. But GM has been relying on MBA's with no car knowledge for too long and look where it has gotten them. Case in point:

Lynn Myers was a Pontiac "lifer" who - by never taking a risk - woke up one morning to learn she had been appointed marketing general manager. She continued to miss the evolution of the "computer tuners," who had by now become the next generation of real Pontiac enthusiasts. They had learned how to combine a laptop and a few "bolt-on" parts to really make the [Grand Prix] GTP fly! To this generation - in image- the GTP was indeed the closest thing to come out of Pontiac since the first GTO. And on the subject of the GTO, Myers and her team completely missed the magnificent heritage opportunity. She missed a market full of real Pontiac "lovers" who were pleading for a new rear-drive perfomrance coupe. She had no idea what it meant for a car to be called a "GTO." In fact, she told me once that the new '04 GTO was never meant to be an "M-Car." When I asked, "what is an 'M-Car'?" she replied, "A 'muscle car,' and we are not going to ever drag race it. We're going to use it in sports car road racing." I said "Oh my God" and walked away with my head shaking.Taken from Jim Wangers op-ed in the current issue of Pontiac Enthusiast. I wish I could post the entire article but there's no electronic version online and it's too long to type out. He goes into a lot of detail about who is really to blame for the failure of Pontiac. And I'm sure a lot of the same can be said for the rest of GM.

[BurninrubberGT]

I cannot discredit Mullaly. He has definitely brought Ford a long way. Granted, they still have a long way to go, but they are finally on the right track with the new Fusion and Taurus. But GM has been relying on MBA's with no car knowledge for too long and look where it has gotten them. Case in point:

Taken from Jim Wangers op-ed in the current issue of Pontiac Enthusiast. I wish I could post the entire article but there's no electronic version online and it's too long to type out. He goes into a lot of detail about who is really to blame for the failure of Pontiac. And I'm sure a lot of the same can be said for the rest of GM.

i read it in the magazine, it is hands down the best article about pontiac out there

[ib4200]

I cannot discredit Mullaly. He has definitely brought Ford a long way. Granted, they still have a long way to go, but they are finally on the right track with the new Fusion and Taurus. But GM has been relying on MBA's with no car knowledge for too long and look where it has gotten them. Case in point:

Taken from Jim Wangers op-ed in the current issue of Pontiac Enthusiast. I wish I could post the entire article but there's no electronic version online and it's too long to type out. He goes into a lot of detail about who is really to blame for the failure of Pontiac. And I'm sure a lot of the same can be said for the rest of GM.

c'mon type more

[HeadlessNorseman]

How the F^@# is GM going to BUILD EXCITEMENT with a Pontiac Vibe?.....

You used to be able to get those toyota ones with the 180hp 2zz just like the lotus elise. 1.8L toyota vtec lol. Not super fast but a fun car for what it is. Too bad!

[HeadlessNorseman]

I agree to a point but the last part...the necessary evil is where we're fundamentally different. I just get really really worried any time government steps into the private sector, especially with some of the TARP games that are being played...call me a tin foil hat wearer but it worries me. The Constitution has been trampled on for the last few years and it's only getting worse.

I agree with your overall sentiment, esp about the constitution. The government should keep its nose out of everything. Its job is to make laws based on the constitution, enforce them, and maintain the army to defend the country, not to play world police. But yeah aside from that GMs problem is that it rode a wave of cheap gas for too long without looking where to go afterwards. Now the wave is gone. I also feel that the UAW is like 90% of their problem.

[BigAls87Z28]

Everyone rode the cheap gas thing, because people were buying the products.
And it just so happend that these said vehicles are huge profit makers.
Name me ONE company that will abandon a massivly growing market that makes 3-4x the profit of other products you make?

I dont want to hear that "GM doesnt make cars that people want to buy" because for 72 years, no one sold more cars then GM, and GM is still #2!! So thats a lot of cars that people arent buying. And they are still #1 in the US.

There are so many false reasons why GM failed. GM failed because they could not make profit from regular vehicles, were spending money on trying to fix that on top of making thier vehicles better and more desirable, and the economy took a giant dump on itself.

Ford is looking good, but its to me a false perception. They still are losing money hand over fist, and once GM and Chrysler come out of Chap 11, they will have jumped so far ahead of Ford in profitability and debt reduction that Ford will have to find a new way to fix themselves. I will say that in a year or less, Ford will have problems unless the economy turns around or that GM and Chrysler surge and Ford rides the wave.
Ford's products are marginally better, with only one or two stand-out products. Most of thier bread and butter cars are old and tiresome.

[Frosty]

I dont want to hear that "GM doesnt make cars that people want to buy"

Yup, that line is complete and utter BS. With that said why should GM move to smaller callers like some experts are saying? Why should GM produce more fuel efficient vehicles if gas prices stay low(well lower than the crisis last year)?

You mark my words Al, aside from the Cobalt replacement you're going to see a newer lineup of small, eco-friendly, uber fuel efficient vehicles(eventually, not right now). Why? Not because the public wants them but once the federal government eventually implements a federal gas tax to keep prices high people are going to HAVE to buy them. Maybe you can add this idea in with the rest of the conspiracy theories going around but I have a sinking feeling a federal gas tax is coming and it's going to force people to buy smaller cars. Hopefully GM sees the writing on the wall in order to survive.