View Full Version : The New.. Z28.
BullittSVT
12-20-2010, 02:42 PM
http://www.chevroletreports.com/blog/1035861_gm-confirms-the-2011-chevrolet-camaro-z28-is-a-go
Yes.. it's been announced. Now I personally prefer the 5.0 over the SS, but.. this new Z28 looks like it'll murder both the 5.0 and the GT500. Ford will have to step up their game to compete with this monster, first by realizing that if you want power, no replacement for displacement. Also stop using stupid truck engines for your performance cars! The 5.4L they use is a crappy platform for sports cars.
Seriously though, GM is offering some SERIOUS bang for the buck.. It's creeping heavily into Corvette territory.. maybe it made it's own niche, the Super Pony Car?
SilverDropTop
12-20-2010, 04:00 PM
If they can keep the pricing below $45K, that will be my new car. I love how they deleted the SS bumper vent and added the taller cowl hood. Add a catback, smaller pulley, and tune and your pushing 500 to the tires. SICK!!!
Tru2Chevy
12-20-2010, 04:19 PM
Yes, it was announced a while ago. That article is from September :D
- Justin
Firebird92
12-20-2010, 04:31 PM
wow lol it's like why buy a ZR1 now lol this thing is half the price and for 5-10 grand more you can match or even pass the ZR1 numbers, but i guess it's still the idea of having a vette vs a Z28
LTb1ow
12-20-2010, 04:38 PM
When is the new trans am coming out?
afclubkid21
12-20-2010, 04:41 PM
This was posted on AZFBA back in September by one of our sponsors:
just got some info today from a lil birdy. GMPP used a local dyno here to do some testing on the 2012 Z28 camaro. The Z2 made8 489RWHP. then with a set of custom headers it picked up 44 rwhp. sorry to let the cat out of the bag
Frosty
12-20-2010, 08:57 PM
wow lol it's like why buy a ZR1 now lol this thing is half the price and for 5-10 grand more you can match or even pass the ZR1 numbers, but i guess it's still the idea of having a vette vs a Z28
You're kidding right?
BigAls87Z28
12-20-2010, 10:06 PM
wow lol it's like why buy a ZR1 now lol this thing is half the price and for 5-10 grand more you can match or even pass the ZR1 numbers, but i guess it's still the idea of having a vette vs a Z28
Gunna have to have a lot more power to make for the half a ton in weight difference. This is not a Z28. This is a Camaro GT500
Firebird92
12-21-2010, 01:01 AM
You're kidding right?
I'm not saying in all sense of a zr1 but i mean the number as in HP and TQ not track times or handling i mean look at the z28 it's a block
Frosty
12-21-2010, 06:45 AM
#'s don't mean anything when it's still slower and less of a car in every aspect.
greenformula92
12-21-2010, 08:15 AM
shouldnt a "SS" model be faster then a Z28. i think they have the badging reversed IMHO
3.4 grape of wrath
12-21-2010, 08:41 AM
When is the new trans am coming out?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqryZ3GZ7fc
Frosty
12-21-2010, 08:43 AM
shouldnt a "SS" model be faster then a Z28. i think they have the badging reversed IMHO
:no:
maroman88
12-21-2010, 09:27 AM
shouldnt a "SS" model be faster then a Z28. i think they have the badging reversed IMHO
must be a 4th gen thing ! hehe
BigAls87Z28
12-21-2010, 12:00 PM
shouldnt a "SS" model be faster then a Z28. i think they have the badging reversed IMHO
You are under the age of 30, and have been altered by the 4th gen.
Raist103
12-21-2010, 12:07 PM
shouldnt a "SS" model be faster then a Z28. i think they have the badging reversed IMHO
if your 16 and dont know cars then yes lol
WildBillyT
12-21-2010, 12:54 PM
shouldnt a "SS" model be faster then a Z28. i think they have the badging reversed IMHO
:no:
must be a 4th gen thing ! hehe
You are under the age of 30, and have been altered by the 4th gen.
if your 16 and dont know cars then yes lol
First gen Z/28 was a dog in the quarter. SS396 blew it out of the water. But it depends on his definition of "faster".
Slow-V6
12-21-2010, 08:29 PM
I thought the IROC Z was the fastest? j/k
BonzoHansen
12-21-2010, 09:10 PM
First gen Z/28 was a dog in the quarter. SS396 blew it out of the water. But it depends on his definition of "faster".
SS was an appearance package! :lol:
Z28 was a better open track car (it's main design intent)
Slow-V6
12-21-2010, 09:21 PM
SS was an appearance package! :lol:
Z28 was a better open track car (it's main design intent)
So was the SS396 faster in the 1/4 then the Z28?
Anti_Rice_Guy
12-21-2010, 09:45 PM
First gen Z/28 was a dog in the quarter. SS396 blew it out of the water. But it depends on his definition of "faster".
So was the SS396 faster in the 1/4 then the Z28?
:nod:
BonzoHansen
12-21-2010, 09:50 PM
Who cares? A BBC will out run an LS motor too :lol: There is more to life than 1/4 mile! How would that 396 make out at 7500+ rpm on a road course for hours? What about the SS350? There were 6 cyl SS Chevelles, no? So in the beginning, SS=appearance package, Z28=road race. There weren't even Z28 badges on the 67, it was simply a race package ala 1LE. As with everything, marketers bent things as they wanted later lol.
WBT, do you have 1/4 mile #s on a 396 car vs a Z28? I figure the 396 must be faster in the 1/4 but I'm just curious.
Slow-V6
12-21-2010, 09:53 PM
#'s don't mean anything when it's still slower and less of a car in every aspect.
Bet the Z28 would handle a crash better then a ZR1!!
BonzoHansen
12-21-2010, 09:54 PM
Bet the Z28 would handle a crash better then a ZR1!!
hell yeah! I was poking around insurance auction websites and saw a number of rolled over 2010s. Man, they are tanks! Very strong. We need a half track version.
Slow-V6
12-21-2010, 09:58 PM
Who cares? A BBC will out run an LS motor too :lol: There is more to life than 1/4 mile!
.
Oh I am sorry but when I think Camaro and BBC I think 1/4 miles times.. When I think Z28 and SS I am sorry but I dont think Road course cars.. I have owned 2nd, 3rd, and 4th gens but never a 1st Gen so I dont know what kind of road course cars they were.. I know that I have never taken any of my F-bodies to a road course track. The only tracks they have been to is the 1/4 tracks.. I guess I am in that 30 and under age range as well..
BonzoHansen
12-21-2010, 10:01 PM
That is the history whether you choose to accept it or not. The marketers changed it over the years, you are proof of that.
Slow-V6
12-21-2010, 10:15 PM
That is the history whether you choose to accept it or not. The marketers changed it over the years, you are proof of that.
My uncle still has his 69 GTO Ram air 3 (I believe) in his garage and he always tells me stories about when they use to hang out at the Mcdonalds on 168 in Mt ephraim NJ every night. That was the car spot in the late 60's early 70's. His car was a pretty stout car but he said when the camaro 396 SS and the other SS chevys rolled in that they were the big dogs that unless you were a big block you would not want to drag race.. They use to run down were 295 is. This is my Uncle who told me His stories about when he was into street racing and Drag racing. He bought His GT0 brand new and he still has it.
Apparantly the marketers changed it pretty much from the begining.
BigAls87Z28
12-22-2010, 12:22 AM
So was the SS396 faster in the 1/4 then the Z28?
My uncle still has his 69 GTO Ram air 3 (I believe) in his garage and he always tells me stories about when they use to hang out at the Mcdonalds on 168 in Mt ephraim NJ every night. That was the car spot in the late 60's early 70's. His car was a pretty stout car but he said when the camaro 396 SS and the other SS chevys rolled in that they were the big dogs that unless you were a big block you would not want to drag race.. They use to run down were 295 is. This is my Uncle who told me His stories about when he was into street racing and Drag racing. He bought His GT0 brand new and he still has it.
Apparantly the marketers changed it pretty much from the begining.
First off, the SS396 came in 3 different power levels, 325, 350, 375hp. IIRC, the 375hp is the only car that was able to outpower the Z28.
Yes, modded big blocks are very powerful, and in a drag race, Id rather take a 396 big block over a high revving, small cube, short stroked 302.
But on the track, a real race car, Ill take the Z28.
In 1970, when Trans Am rules allowed more cubes, the first LT-1 350ci stepped ontot he stage, making 370hp in the vette, 360 in the Camaro Z28. The LT-1 was ONLY available in the Z28 Camaro, while other 350's were of much lower output.
Also by 70, the 396(402) was on its way out due to emissions and gas prices. LT-1 was the engine to have.
SS was dead from the mid 70's to 1996 when SLP brought it back, and eventually SLP became a Tier 1 supplier and GM built the SS in house.
Z28 will always be the race car. You can always talk about cars on the streets of such and such time, but realize that none of them were probably stock.
Frosty
12-22-2010, 05:43 AM
Like Scott said, there is much, MUCH more than 1/4 mile times. This history is what it is, the Z/28 was an overall better performer, than the SS. The Z/28 was in essence a race car that was more than just in a straight line...FACT, not opinion.
The badges are correct more so now with the whole retro theme.
BonzoHansen
12-22-2010, 06:16 AM
My uncle still has his 69 GTO Ram air 3 (I believe) in his garage and he always tells me stories about when they use to hang out at the Mcdonalds on 168 in Mt ephraim NJ every night. That was the car spot in the late 60's early 70's. His car was a pretty stout car but he said when the camaro 396 SS and the other SS chevys rolled in that they were the big dogs that unless you were a big block you would not want to drag race.. They use to run down were 295 is. This is my Uncle who told me His stories about when he was into street racing and Drag racing. He bought His GT0 brand new and he still has it.
Apparantly the marketers changed it pretty much from the begining.
There you go. No mention of the SS350. The fact there were numerous engine options, and all of those engines were available w/o buying the SS package shows the SS was an appearance package. I'd more worried about a dog-dished L78 Camaro over most any SS.
sweetbmxrider
12-22-2010, 07:29 AM
my berger panel is teh fastest!!!11!1!11!!!!!!!1!
LTb1ow
12-22-2010, 07:54 AM
my LT1 is teh fastest!!!11!1!11!!!!!!!1!
You got the wrong kind of bad pal!
Slow-V6
12-22-2010, 08:19 AM
There you go. No mention of the SS350. The fact there were numerous engine options, and all of those engines were available w/o buying the SS package shows the SS was an appearance package. I'd more worried about a dog-dished L78 Camaro over most any SS.
So how many 396 Z28's were there? just wonderring...
Anti_Rice_Guy
12-22-2010, 08:23 AM
So how many 396 Z28's were there? just wonderring...
First gen Z28's only came in with the DZ302.
Idk how many 396 SS's there were.
Slow-V6
12-22-2010, 08:32 AM
First gen Z28's only came in with the DZ302.
Idk how many 396 SS's there were.
So in other words if you wanted the camaro with the baddest engine in it then you had to buy a SS right? Interesting...
Looks like the baddest production motor back in the 1st gens was the L78 396 with the aluminum heads.. 375hp and 415 ftlbs
The 350 in the SS was also rated at 300 hp in 1969 compared to the 302 in the Z28 which was rated at 290.. Now numbers dont mean everything but comparing motor to motor it seems as though the SS had more power then the Z28's But the Z28's, just like in the 4th gen years were the lighter, not as many optioned as the SS's were. Unlike the 4th gen years the SS and the Z28 had different motors all together. But if you wanted a factory big block back in the 60's then you had to get a SS so it seems it was more then just an apperance option..
So now with this new Z28 coming out they seemed to completly turn the table with it. It has the baddest motor in it and will probably have just as many options as a SS..
BonzoHansen
12-22-2010, 09:29 AM
First gen Z28's only came in with the DZ302 They were all 302s, not all DZ motors. 67, 68=MO/MP(smog version); 69=DZ
So in other words if you wanted the camaro with the baddest engine in it then you had to buy a SS right? Interesting...
No. You could get the same engine w/o going SS. And the SS package didn't make it faster. You could get any engine/trim package combination except the 302&Z28 which are a single deal. No SS needed to get L78, L89.
You are missing the point. This conversation was not about engines or production numbers, it's about 'badging'. And the history of Camaro badging is the Z28 was a car built to meet Trans Am racing rules. The SS was a badging package that only required a V8, not any particular one. Z28 was a racing option, one that won a lot of Trans Am racing, which mattered more back then.
Everyone knows the HP figures are wrong back then. The 302@290hp is a joke, closer to 400. Not a great street engine, it lacked useful bottom end. But it pulled past 7500 and the HP kept going higher past the 5000 rpm or so they used to advertise the 302’s 290hp. That said, I have no argument the 396 car was a best quarter miler. Ignoring the ZL1 option.
But SS started as a trim package; Z28 started as a race car. It also netted power discs, 15” wheels. No AC. No automatics. The 3rd gen 1LE is similar in comncept.
BigAls87Z28
12-22-2010, 11:44 AM
I dont agree with the engine in the Z28. I wish it was morelike what Ford did with the Boss. Lighter, lower, crank up the power a bit more, tighten up suspension, better brakes, and let her rip. THAT is a real Z28.
Call this Z28, a ZL1 or something...
BonzoHansen
12-22-2010, 01:23 PM
I dont agree with the engine in the Z28. I wish it was morelike what Ford did with the Boss. Lighter, lower, crank up the power a bit more, tighten up suspension, better brakes, and let her rip. THAT is a real Z28.
Call this Z28, a ZL1 or something...
I agree with. This is a supercharged tugboat. You want a true 1LE car like the 3rd gen ones.
Frosty
12-22-2010, 01:28 PM
OMG you mentioned a thirdgen, blasphemy!
NastyEllEssWon
12-22-2010, 02:23 PM
all this debate between road course and 1/4 mile times just shows why the fbody platform was so successful. its just versatile and can perform in a variety of ways depending upon what you want and choose for the car. :nod:
Slow-V6
12-22-2010, 02:39 PM
No. You could get the same engine w/o going SS. And the SS package didn't make it faster. You could get any engine/trim package combination except the 302&Z28 which are a single deal. No SS needed to get L78, L89.
So there were 4 camaro's back then. Base, RS, SS, and Z28.. You can mix a RSSS and a RSZ28 together.. So what you are saying is that you could get a 396 in a base, RS and a SS but not in a Z28? If that were the case I would get a Base camaro with a 396 and no options and that thing would have been a rocket..
It also seemed that starting with the 2nd gen the camaro turned into Muscle car status..
I dont really care about badging anyways. They got rid of SS then brought it back, They got rid of Z28 ,then brought it back, Then got rid of it again, now they are bringing it back.. I am sorry but for me the history of the Camaro died back in 2002 with the Firebird.. These new cars are very nice and I hope they last but they are not my taste. Still better then a mustang however..
Slow-V6
12-22-2010, 02:41 PM
all this debate between road course and 1/4 mile times just shows why the fbody platform was so successful. its just versatile and can perform in a variety of ways depending upon what you want and choose for the car. :nod:
Good point.. I tell you what. They gave you a ton of options all the way up to the 4th gens. Maybe thats what helped kill the F-body..
WildBillyT
12-26-2010, 10:29 AM
They were all 302s, not all DZ motors. 67, 68=MO/MP(smog version); 69=DZ
No. You could get the same engine w/o going SS. And the SS package didn't make it faster. You could get any engine/trim package combination except the 302&Z28 which are a single deal. No SS needed to get L78, L89.
Scott:
Do you have some examples of this? This is the first I've heard that you could get an "SS engine" in a non-SS car. The hottest engine in a base car was an L30 or an LM1 IIRC, barring COPO 9560 and 9561 of course.
Regarding the first generation cars, as I said before it depends on your definition of speed. Z/28s are not quarter milers, and numbers from back in the day when all else was equal proves that. Unless you got one with an M20 and 4.xx gears, where you might do OK. But the cr transmissions and 3.73 gears and not much low end power were a bad match for dragging. However the SS396 cars are not competent road course cars. Nose heavy FTL.
Not really a "which is better" more than two different speed options.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.