View Full Version : 05 Mustang GT dyno
BigAls87Z28
10-03-2004, 10:16 PM
254 rwhp @ 5500rpm
274 torque @ 3750rpm
http://www.livernoismotorsports.com...0-p-1-large.jpg
http://www.livernoismotorsports.com...p-723-large.jpg
htp://www.livernoismotorsports.com...p-724-large.jpg
http://www.livernoismotorsports.com...p-728-large.jpg
So much for this "underrated" engine that is gunna smoke (insert car here).
89 Trans Am WS6
10-03-2004, 10:37 PM
So much for links that work. :(
Tony Danza
10-03-2004, 10:58 PM
that is from the 3-valves per cylender next generation engine right?
thats around what most automatic stock LT1s do, maybe less torque though. But arnt those new ford engines supposed to have 300fw?
oh ya.....the links dont work for me either
those numbers are on a mustang dyno
Fastbird
10-04-2004, 08:34 AM
those numbers are on a mustang dyno
That's going to be a difference. The car already ran a 13.6@99 (or something like that) so it's obviously got the low end grunt, but the top end seems to be lacking some.
jims69camaro
10-04-2004, 04:24 PM
no, wait, those are the numbers for the 4 cylinder motor. right? are they kidding, or what? that's more embarrassing than a mid '80s camaro Z28...
inthered
10-09-2004, 09:44 AM
the links don't work because they were directly copied from another message board...
you need the full link, not the abbreviated "..." link to be posted... *sigh*
Fastbird
10-09-2004, 11:05 AM
Those numbers aren't that bad. Let's use a conservative Mustang to Dynojet comparison of -15% for the mustang dyno from the dynojet numbers.
254 / .85 = 298
274 / .85 = 322
Those are comparable to stock LS1 numbers, and the mustang is rated at 300 and ??? for TQ, so I'd say those are actually pretty good.
BigAls87Z28
10-10-2004, 01:18 AM
yeah, pretty good...for 1998.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.