![]() |
Quote:
|
So theres a little problem with my experiment.
the threadmill has a slight incline which makes the skateboard fall of everytime. Plus skateboard is ****ing heavy. im very bored right now so i was thinking can take the wheels off and try to mount them on the fan directly :lol: and try to make the treadmill even with the surface. if i do it ill post the results if not then **** it. |
Ok. **** you guys. I put it to the ultimate test. I took one of my dads RC airplaines and put it on our treadmill. I had my dad slowly increase the speed of the treadmill with the speed of the plane. At full throttle (or close to it) guess what? It didnt take off. It was just hopping a bit from the propeller generating wind force to move under the wings.
|
Quote:
|
Ok, let me correct myself so that the Commie can understand me.
As long as its a long, flat, solid platform, it will take off, doesnt matter if the long, flat, solid platform is moving or not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
most treadmills are adjustable i thought, but i guess you could put something underneath the back end of it to even it out
|
Quote:
|
Also realize this, the plane must have enough power to overcome friction between the wheels and the ground. Also, if the wheels don't have bearings, there is a tremendous amount of friction that is being generated which takes power away from the forward movement.
~Ted |
so now we gonna hear how he did it wrong? um...isee...we should go rent a C172 and maybe do it with that thing. Ill get the plane if u get the big enough conveyeer belt.
|
Quote:
~Ted |
The whole idea that the plane will take off is based on the fact that real planes can clearly provide enough force to overcome the frictional force caused by the wheels and their wheels have bearings and are designed to psin as freely as possible. They do this because the less friction, the less thrust they need to get the plane to move which equals better fuel mileage.
~Ted |
Quote:
|
Some can, but not all....how do we know what kind of plane koll used? we don't until he replies. I'm not arguing all R/C planes aren't capable, I just put it out there that the type of plane also has an effect on the experiment. Just like different cars, some are built better and perform better/different than others and if you can't agree to that, then there is no point in discussing this further with you.
~Ted |
I say..... suck it Treveck!
|
Quote:
|
At the rate this thread is increasing..... we should have it archived.....
:rofl: To add fuel to the fire.... What if it was a light weight air plane? What if the tires were flat? What if it was a cargo plane.... and cargo fell out? What if the plane had live stock in it.... and they ran forward really quick? What if a gust of wind came across the plane/ conveyer belt sideways? What's the clearance Clarence? What's the vector Victor? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
After this I did it again. One was with a stunt plane. It has a 3 foot wingspan. The other one was "Yellow Belly". 5 Foot wing span. Runs off of gas and not RC Nitro.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i tried to tell you guys the plane wouldn't take off. once you get something firmly affixed in your head and you can justify it, nothing will change your mind. i bet if someone rigged up a huge conveyor and used a 747, you still wouldn't believe it if the plane didn't take off. now, all of the hair splitting is just incredibly stupid. it doesn't matter what kind of aircraft it is, as long as under normal circumstances it can achieve flight under its own power. leave it alone, already. |
The next time I take a ****, this thread is getting printed out. That is all.
|
Quote:
we need a poll! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.