![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This thread needs a little less sausage plz omgkthxbye. :lol:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
excuses are the tools of the incompetent, used to build monuments of nothingness. and those of us who specialize in their usage, seldom amount to anything else.
|
someone had chinese food on the way home. that from a fortune cookie?
|
dave, the way the car launched and moved down the lane, it looked more like no boost than low boost.
i hope you understand what it sounds like to people when you go through the ignition, ecm, bov, and wastegate as reasons for the problem all with in an hour or two of running 6 or 7 seconds slower than predicted. |
mike = correct.
Jake - no we didnt, but we can make up for it at the bbq :lol: |
Quote:
|
where did you dyno your car to get those #'s? even if it did good in teh 1/8th it didnt look like no 400= rwhp car :confused:
|
Quote:
its one of the things we have to recite at the academy |
you know the hose, that justin pointed out that wasnt conected? what is that? any chance it could come off and that be the problem?
|
Quote:
|
place over here in spootswood,mrc no boost = no power.done on the other motor with the good heads.the motor i had in the car today was just a bone stock 3.1.so it would have been lower at the same boost level.the only time that car felt good was the one pass with the wastegate bypassed.but that didnt work out to well lmao.i didnt care though by that point i was so pissed i couldnt get the car down the track.im deff gonna find out what went wrong and not make the same mistake on the new motor.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i 2nd that!! why v6's anyway. why not turbo a real motor? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.