NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   Lounge (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Headers Or Gears???? (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=26334)

bad64chevelle 05-28-2007 11:38 PM

Well, do what you want to do i did my whole rear (posi, gears, TA girdle, install kit, and some other things for under 900) but there was no cost to installing them. 900 is WAY too high. Headers are worth the money also, maybe I didnt see as much of a difference because i had mids, but when i got the gears it was night and day.

Jersey_TA 05-28-2007 11:40 PM

I'd say headers since the price of gas is retarded.

Savage_Messiah 05-29-2007 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camvill (Post 349310)
i have a 4 speed auto though :-(

so do i. and less power so its better for yoyu, just f****** man up and get some 4.10s.

Jersey_TA 05-29-2007 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camvill (Post 349310)
i have a 4 speed auto though :-(

You shouldn't go any higher than 3.73s with an auto. 4.10s are for the manual guys.

Jersey_TA 05-29-2007 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER (Post 349225)
gears are a way better bang for the buck and will not mess up mileage, that is jsut an old wives tale. most people will see the same or in some cases even slightly better highway mileage. your mileage around town will change if you like messing around, but that is up to how you drive more than the gears.

I drove with the cruise set for 928 miles(one way when I drive home to IL) when I was stock and got 310-315 miles per tank. I added 3.73 gears and that mileage went down to 290 +-5. If you think about it like that if you only drove on the highway to work and back you would cost yourself roughly an extra $1.50 per fill up(if the price of premium is $3.12). Multiply that by an average fill up of 3 times per month x 12 months = $54 if you just drive normal on the highway. It's all roughly estimation though ;) Since he just drives around town he's going to fill up more in theory. It all depends on the rpm he's at now compared to the rpm he will be at with 3.73s.

njfastestcamaro 05-29-2007 03:56 AM

id would put 4:10 and an aftermarket tran cooler so u dont burn up the trans

Rafterman 05-29-2007 06:12 AM

go with the gears. this will be more of an improvement on the car than just the nice flow of headers.

JSPERFORMANCE 05-29-2007 07:44 AM

If you are set on keeping the ten bolt I wouldnt reccomend going any higher numerrically than 3.73's. The main strength issue with 10 bolts is the pinion and when you go to real steep gears the pinion gear gets real tiny and that creates more heat and stress on less surface area. Plus with your lt1 and auto you make your power considerably lower than ls1 cars so to use it you want to be going through the traps between 5800-6300 so that you do not nose over before the stripe. For a proper gear install you are looking to spend around 350-400 in parts and $300 for the rebuild.

Tru2Chevy 05-29-2007 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jersey_TA (Post 349492)
Since he just drives around town he's going to fill up more in theory. It all depends on the rpm he's at now compared to the rpm he will be at with 3.73s.

On the highway, most people will lose some mileage, but if you can keep your foot out of the go pedal, you should actually improve mileage around town. This is because you're basically giving the car more leverage to get moving from a stop, which places less load on the engine.

- Justin

Camvill 05-29-2007 01:08 PM

can u guys post some links for gears and shops>>>??

firebirdcrazy 05-29-2007 01:37 PM

I posted a thread earlier that SLP will have headers for for lowered F bodies by the end of the summer. I took off my old headers will wait for these new ones.

NJSPEEDER 05-29-2007 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jersey_TA (Post 349492)
I drove with the cruise set for 928 miles(one way when I drive home to IL) when I was stock and got 310-315 miles per tank. I added 3.73 gears and that mileage went down to 290 +-5. If you think about it like that if you only drove on the highway to work and back you would cost yourself roughly an extra $1.50 per fill up(if the price of premium is $3.12). Multiply that by an average fill up of 3 times per month x 12 months = $54 if you just drive normal on the highway. It's all roughly estimation though ;) Since he just drives around town he's going to fill up more in theory. It all depends on the rpm he's at now compared to the rpm he will be at with 3.73s.

that would equate to about 1-1.5 gallon every other tank. so for somewhere in the $3-5 very other tank you get better et's and a much more fun car to drive.
i could live with that for the extra tenth that the 4.10's are worth over 3.73's.
you have also told me the average and peak speeds on your trips, far from typical highway travel speeds buddy. :p

BonzoHansen 05-29-2007 02:53 PM

As a former 3rd gen owner for when decent headers didn't exist (at least under $800), gears really lit my car up.

Jersey_TA 05-29-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER (Post 349634)
that would equate to about 1-1.5 gallon every other tank. so for somewhere in the $3-5 very other tank you get better et's and a much more fun car to drive.
i could live with that for the extra tenth that the 4.10's are worth over 3.73's.
you have also told me the average and peak speeds on your trips, far from typical highway travel speeds buddy. :p

I don't mess around on my trips home. I've driven home 9+ times and there were only 2 times that I actually messed around. The other trips were with the cruise set at 73 mph all through pennsy, west virg., ohio, indianna, and IL. ;)

Camvill 05-29-2007 09:47 PM

idk im kinda leaning towards pacesetter longtubes i cant really afford this gas thing and i can install these myself.

Squirrel 05-30-2007 12:56 AM

i wish i had the 94+ trans in my car when i still had it...cuz when i eventually did do gears 4:30's were gonna be the min, most likely 456s

WildBillyT 05-31-2007 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirrel (Post 349872)
i wish i had the 94+ trans in my car when i still had it...cuz when i eventually did do gears 4:30's were gonna be the min, most likely 456s

I would think 4.30's or 4.56's would have a short life in a 7.5" 10 bolt. That's a small pinion gear...

NJSPEEDER 05-31-2007 02:21 PM

the thing that kills the 7.5 is not the gears or the carrier itself, it is the case. the casting is thin and can easily distort in stock form, causing the carrier to shift and pull the ring gear away from the pinion. this can be easily overcome by using a cast cover with bearing supports and welding the axle tubes to the center section.
it is in no way going to take the kind of power a 12bolt or 9inch can, but plenty of people have made pass after pass in ful weight cars without failure using a properly preped 7.5 that costs a fraction of a 12bolt.

JSPERFORMANCE 06-01-2007 12:35 AM

ehhhh WRONG the housing size does not allow for decent sized gears or bearings which is where the deflection is. You can weld the whole rear into a gigantic block of metal and it will still break. The cover is more bling than anything else because it only holds the carrier in place and does nothing to keep the pinion from driving into the ring gear and chewing it up. Either way the smaller the gearset the weaker the unit will be. Therefore the 10 bolt is junk ... period. I dont reccomend using them in anything faster than 11.80 with an auto or 12.0 with a stick. Wanna see proof? I have a load of broken 10 bolt parts at the shop from rears that were "built" (most of them are even my own) There comes a time when you just have to accept the fact that you need to replace the rear in these cars if you want to put any kind of serious power to the ground.

NJSPEEDER 06-01-2007 03:41 PM

the case deflects and distorts. that is how the ring runs away from teh pinion gear and shreds the teeth. the ring gear could be a foot thick and ten feet around and it wouldn't make a difference, because once the case starts distorting, only a fraction of the teeth are making contact.

for a daily driver like this application, a little beefing up of the housing and a set of 3.73 or 4.10 gears will be fine.

Squirrel 06-02-2007 12:34 AM

when referring to gears, the object is to reach in your pants and see if your balls are there...if said balls are present, go 4.XX...if not, 3.XX are for you

Savage_Messiah 06-02-2007 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirrel (Post 350902)
when referring to gears, the object is to reach in your pants and see if your balls are there...if said balls are present, go 4.XX...if not, 3.XX are for you

QFMFT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JSPERFORMANCE 06-02-2007 07:34 AM

Its not the rig gear moving away from the pinion its the pinion that is the problem.. Everything is reletive when you go from a 7.5" ring to an 8.5" or better the pinion size grows with it as well as the bearings and other hardware. That is where you gain your strength.

WildBillyT 06-02-2007 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirrel (Post 350902)
when referring to gears, the object is to reach in your pants and see if your balls are there...if said balls are present, go 4.XX...if not, 3.XX are for you

Well if the strength isn't there your rear axle is going to suffer from a "premature ejaculation" the first time you do a high RPM dump. :lol:

JSPERFORMANCE 06-02-2007 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WildBillyT (Post 350942)
Well if the strength isn't there your rear axle is going to suffer from a "premature ejaculation" the first time you do a high RPM dump. :lol:

:rofl: :rofl: premature ejaculation :rofl: :rofl:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.