![]() |
Quote:
i think i covered most of it :scratch: |
i say after every 5 years
seems more reasonable |
there are so many old people that drive literally 20 under the limit around here... i've almost gotten into an accident because some old hag couldn't see over the wheel and decided to pull into my lane last second... they need testing every 6 months...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
... your mom couldn't make it to the hospital or what??? :lol: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
but every year is too much. every five, until they reach a certain age or have an accident - then, as punishment, every year until they get the points removed or stop driving altogether. the only thing i would disagree with is the raise in tax. the MVC is a private company, now, and all permits/licenses/registrations are handled by them. i think the state gets a cut, but i am not sure. it might be in the original contract of the sale to not only sell the DMV to that company but that they have to fork over a vig every year for a certain percentage. so you handle it like the MVC handles everything: you make the people renewing their licenses pay for the additional testing. problem solved. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yeh well when they see more car accidents and deaths from crappy roads and too many old people maybe they'll see the light... Or, unlike your friend, they'll be lost in the dark forever... The day I turn 18 is going to be horrible... $3000 a year for car insurance, having to pay taxes and almost everything else... This sucks so much... Hopefully when I go to college in Florida the insurance will be cheaper... Although taxes down there will probably even that out to up here o.0
|
i think we should retest them but i dont know at what rate. yearly seems like it would be too much of a PITA and five years seems like a long time, a lot of stuff could happen in five years. so i voted for once theyve had an accident and then yearly, but by that time it could be too late :?
|
Quote:
retesting using a timeframe, and including everyone - not just the elderly - is proactive and it shuts up all of the would-be-crybabies that would scream age discrimination or some such ********. the bottom line is to make the streets safer, which the seatbelt laws were meant to do but really are just a way for local cops to grap some more of your hard-earned greenbacks. |
we should test them by kicking them in the hip. if their hip breaks and they fall down, then they cannot drive anymore. if they remain standing, theyre ok
|
Quote:
|
heheheh
|
i like the retesting idea...but notice it's mostly little old ladies that cause accidents...i was driving behind one on valley rd in wayne and she could barely see over the dash a la Kasey style, and she ended up hopping the curb for two feet and driving on...i passed her a got the hell out of there...
but why can't all families be like old school italian families...neither of my grandmas drive and my grandpa can out-drive most of the people in our family...i vote for the yearly test...but most of the old people are our best Grand Marquis buyers... |
we need more hans moleman people driving around! and getting hit in groin with football
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.