NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   Lounge (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   High School Physics (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=46830)

ljstella 09-13-2009 06:48 PM

Well, I just got locked out, just before I tried something I came up with... I just emailed the teacher to see if I can get another few tries... ugh :( thanks anyway

FlyingDutchman 09-13-2009 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ljstella (Post 635483)
Well, I just got locked out, just before I tried something I came up with... I just emailed the teacher to see if I can get another few tries... ugh :( thanks anyway

whatd you try?

ljstella 09-13-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97camaro (Post 635485)
whatd you try?

I tried using Velocity Final squared is equal to Velocity Inital Squared plus two times the acceleration times displacement.

I got 0= V initial squared + 2(-10.0)(34.04)
V initial squared = 680.6881
V initial = 26.09
It didn't work... or maybe I'm doing it wrong...

FlyingDutchman 09-13-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ljstella (Post 635490)
I tried using Velocity Final squared is equal to Velocity Inital Squared plus two times the acceleration times displacement.

I got 0= V initial squared + 2(-10.0)(34.04)
V initial squared = 680.6881
V initial = 26.09
It didn't work... or maybe I'm doing it wrong...

hmm well your lookin for the max velocity he can go right?

88 km/h = 24.444444444 m/s

so first you figure out how much distance his reaction takes (0.75s)

d = (v)(t) -> d = (24.4)(0.75) = 18.3m til he hits the brakes leaving 19.7m to stop yes?

Knipps 09-13-2009 07:11 PM

Why are you guys doing this kid's HW?

FlyingDutchman 09-13-2009 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knipps (Post 635494)
Why are you guys doing this kid's HW?

i ... dont ... know .... lol but now i wanna know the right answer

ljstella 09-13-2009 07:20 PM

I came up with 88km/h as something else in m/s...

I multiplied 88 by 60 to get km/s and then divided by 1000 (that's my error... I should have multiplied by 1000 to get m/s) but then I get something ridiculously huge... if I divide, I get 5.28 m/s and then multiply that by .75 and subtract the product from 38.0 to get 34.04m as the distance from when he starts to brake...

FlyingDutchman 09-13-2009 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ljstella (Post 635498)
I came up with 88km/h as something else in m/s...

I multiplied 88 by 60 to get km/s and then divided by 1000 (that's my error... I should have multiplied by 1000 to get m/s) but then I get something ridiculously huge... if I divide, I get 5.28 m/s and then multiply that by .75 and subtract the product from 38.0 to get 34.04m as the distance from when he starts to brake...

km/h -> m/s

x1000 then / 3600

LTb1ow 09-13-2009 07:34 PM

So this proved you all suck at physics.

ljstella 09-13-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97camaro (Post 635501)
km/h -> m/s

x1000 then / 3600

why 3600?

WildBillyT 09-13-2009 07:41 PM

6.023 x 10^23

FlyingDutchman 09-13-2009 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 635502)
So this proved you all suck at physics.

why?

ljstella 09-13-2009 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WildBillyT (Post 635506)
6.023 x 10^23

Physics, not chemistry! Avogadro's number isn't going to help me!!

madness410 09-13-2009 08:54 PM

he would end up in jail. speed limit is only 65.

jims69camaro 09-14-2009 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 635502)
So this proved you all suck at physics.

:nod:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97camaro (Post 635507)
why?

because you haven't come up with the right formula yet, which means if you do hit the answer (by some means, perhaps the russian's beaming method) it will be by pure luck, not because you have applied the right formula.

that's all physics is unless you are among the elite - then you get to try your own formulas and spend years proving/disproving them, supported, of course, by educational grants from the government and wealthy privateers... applying the right formula.

WildBillyT 09-14-2009 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 635502)
So this proved you all suck at physics.

No, the answer is 19.67 m/s. I posted Avegadro's number because I felt like busting balls- as he should really do his own homework so he doesn't get boned on a test.

I got it the same way 97Camaro did. 18.33m covered until the brakes are applied, 19.67m of distance left, equation will zero out when the initial velocity is ~19.83m/s. The only "ball buster" is how far they want the car to be from the wall to be considered "not hit". 0 is not really right IMO, because they would be exactly touching.

Tsar 09-14-2009 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WildBillyT (Post 635613)
No, the answer is 19.67 m/s. I posted Avegadro's number because I felt like busting balls- as he should really do his own homework so he doesn't get boned on a test.

I got it the same way 97Camaro did. 18.33m covered until the brakes are applied, 19.67m of distance left, equation will zero out when the initial velocity is ~19.83m/s. The only "ball buster" is how far they want the car to be from the wall to be considered "not hit". 0 is not really right IMO, because they would be exactly touching.

So 59 is NOT the answer? :?:

WildBillyT 09-14-2009 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tsar (Post 635626)
So 59 is NOT the answer? :?:

No?

FlyingDutchman 09-14-2009 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jims69camaro (Post 635598)
because you haven't come up with the right formula yet, which means if you do hit the answer (by some means, perhaps the russian's beaming method) it will be by pure luck, not because you have applied the right formula.

that's all physics is unless you are among the elite - then you get to try your own formulas and spend years proving/disproving them, supported, of course, by educational grants from the government and wealthy privateers... applying the right formula.

orly? i used my cheat sheet from physics last year with all the kinematic equations and those are the 'right' formulas

Tsar 09-14-2009 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WildBillyT (Post 635627)
No?

Oh man, I'm so disappointed!

WildBillyT 09-14-2009 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97camaro (Post 635628)
orly? i used my cheat sheet from physics last year with all the kinematic equations and those are the 'right' formulas

LOL. I used the exact same website. Couldn't remember most of them.

LTb1ow 09-14-2009 10:28 AM

Did not figure in speed of light, fail.


:wink:

WildBillyT 09-14-2009 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 635633)
Did not figure in speed of light, fail.


:wink:

If you want we can help you determine the electrical resistance of a dead fuel pump.

LTb1ow 09-14-2009 10:38 AM

Prob pretty high. I would guess more than enough to melt those puny wires that feed it.

sweetbmxrider 09-14-2009 10:53 AM

wait, what motor?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.