NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   Lounge (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   New Z28 has been reconfirmed (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=46988)

sweetbmxrider 09-22-2009 10:30 AM

shweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

bobb1589 09-22-2009 11:30 AM

i might actually be interested in the higher-performance v6 depending on what they do to it

NastyEllEssWon 09-22-2009 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage_Messiah (Post 637780)
and heres living in the past :lol:






and heres to owning v6's and sitting on phone books to see over the wheel :lol:

NJ346 09-22-2009 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 637841)
I'll take the engine/drivetrain.

but, what about teh LTWON!!!

LTb1ow 09-22-2009 01:23 PM

That power train would be most excellent in my speed skiff. LT1 stays in Fbod. ;)

Frosty 09-22-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 637756)
heres hoping for a live axle

Agreed...one of the only complaints I had with my 'vette...I didn't like the way the IRS felt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 637912)
and heres to owning v6's and sitting on phone books to see over the wheel :lol:

Oh snap :rofl:

Blacdout96 09-22-2009 01:33 PM

Yeah, IRS is not the best for drag racing, it's more for cutting corners with. I think the Cobra's had it, then borught the live axle back cause they were jsut squating on the take off.

Anti_Rice_Guy 09-22-2009 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 637718)
You're kidding right?

Think what you want about the hybrid Vette.

http://www.fquick.com/blog/Corvette_...standards/3326

Tru2Chevy 09-22-2009 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 637925)
Agreed...one of the only complaints I had with my 'vette...I didn't like the way the IRS felt.

Neither did the parking lot at Applebees ;)

- Justin

BigAls87Z28 09-22-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blacdout96 (Post 637928)
Yeah, IRS is not the best for drag racing, it's more for cutting corners with. I think the Cobra's had it, then borught the live axle back cause they were jsut squating on the take off.

Don't mix up a band aid system that was in the sn95 cobras to the system in the camaro. The new mustang didn't get irs because it was too expensive to add. At least for ford.
They said it was because that's what the enthusiasts wanted. The also want a 429 cobra jet standard but I guess the didn't get that memo

LTb1ow 09-22-2009 04:19 PM

Al, how is the Z28 going to be heavier, when the article states other wise?

BigAls87Z28 09-22-2009 04:25 PM

Cause it is. 550+ hp will require a few bits of additional support

NastyEllEssWon 09-22-2009 04:27 PM

supercharged camaro is the only way they can get that thing to move properly. get with the times al, you said it yourself in another thread....the safety technology in the new camaro is the reasons its heavier

Tru2Chevy 09-22-2009 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 638048)
Al, how is the Z28 going to be heavier, when the article states other wise?

Where did you read that the Z28 is projected to be lighter than the SS?

- Justin

LTb1ow 09-22-2009 04:42 PM

http://www.motortrend.com/auto_news/..._go/index.html

"The near-4300-pound CTS-V thunders from 0 to 60 mph in 4.1 seconds and nails the quarter mile in 12.3 seconds (automatic) or 12.4 seconds (manual). Top speed is limited to 175 mph in the auto (to preserve the tranny), but the manual will storm to an autobahn-melting 193 mph. As the Z/28 will weigh 200 to 300 pounds less than the CTS-V, it may nail 60 mph in 3.9 seconds and run the quarter in the very low 12s."

Tru2Chevy 09-22-2009 04:59 PM

That's the CTS-V.....we are concerned that the Z28 is heavier than the SS.

- Justin

NastyEllEssWon 09-22-2009 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy (Post 638073)
That's the CTS-V.....we are concerned that the Z28 is heavier than the SS.

- Justin




if it sits in between the cts v and the ss then its right where it should be

Tru2Chevy 09-22-2009 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 638075)
if it sits in between the cts v and the ss then its right where it should be

Well, if it's between the two it won't be too bad, but I would argue that it should be at least between the LT and SS in weight.

- Justin

NastyEllEssWon 09-22-2009 06:08 PM

its the structure of the new camaro that makes it heavy. i dont see where they can lose weight when theyre gonna have to beef it up to hold up

Tru2Chevy 09-22-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 638103)
its the structure of the new camaro that makes it heavy. i dont see where they can lose weight when theyre gonna have to beef it up to hold up

Get rid of frills

- Justin

Blackbirdws6 09-22-2009 08:01 PM

Sounds really pricey but I will dig it. Still would prefer a used one year old c6 to this car but once I see these modded I'll drool.

BigAls87Z28 09-22-2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 638054)
supercharged camaro is the only way they can get that thing to move properly. get with the times al, you said it yourself in another thread....the safety technology in the new camaro is the reasons its heavier

Move properly?
So 0-60 in the mid 4's, quarter mile in the 12's, braking under 110 ft from 60mph, packing 426hp...thas not movign properly?

I didnt say that the safety technology int he Camaro makes it heavy, the chassis is very strong, but the equipment overall makes the car heavier.
How much does a 4th gen Trans Am WS6 weigh? 3600-3700lbs?
Add 20's, IRS suspension, 4 more air bags, massive brakes, full dual exhaust with 4 mufflers, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand your 4th gen would be heavier then a 5th gen.
And the 5th gen goes faster, handles better, drives nicer, has more equipment, and gets better gas milage. Not to mention has better materials.


Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowSomePromise (Post 638058)
http://www.motortrend.com/auto_news/..._go/index.html

"The near-4300-pound CTS-V thunders from 0 to 60 mph in 4.1 seconds and nails the quarter mile in 12.3 seconds (automatic) or 12.4 seconds (manual). Top speed is limited to 175 mph in the auto (to preserve the tranny), but the manual will storm to an autobahn-melting 193 mph. As the Z/28 will weigh 200 to 300 pounds less than the CTS-V, it may nail 60 mph in 3.9 seconds and run the quarter in the very low 12s."

They are wrong. Z28 will come in north of 2 tons, by a good margin.
And the performance wont gain anything near that!! The GT500 runs 4.1-4.3 0-60 and low 12s, only a few tenths off the CTS-V, and the weight gap is about 300lbs.


Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 638075)
if it sits in between the cts v and the ss then its right where it should be

Problem is that it could be heavier then the CTS-V coupe...
Now some might think thats right, that the more expensive CTS-V should be lighter, faster then the lowly Chevy, but what it comes down to are two cars that are within a Cobalt of eachother in price, but the CTS-V offers a better package with better interior, quality, fit and finish, ride, magnaride suspension, etc etc etc...

Quote:

Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon (Post 638103)
its the structure of the new camaro that makes it heavy. i dont see where they can lose weight when theyre gonna have to beef it up to hold up

The chassis is plenty strong, but it will need some stronger driveline parts for the engine.
Additional weight will come from larger radiator, additional coolant for the internal intercooler, stronger motor mounts,
Had they not felt the need to ADD power, but only increase it a bit but focus all the work on a lighter and tighter Z28 package, you get a better car that is faster then the SS without adding all the nonsense.

Frosty 09-22-2009 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tru2Chevy (Post 638043)
Neither did the parking lot at Applebees ;)

- Justin

Shaddap ;)

Blacdout96 09-23-2009 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 (Post 638046)
Don't mix up a band aid system that was in the sn95 cobras to the system in the camaro. The new mustang didn't get irs because it was too expensive to add. At least for ford.
They said it was because that's what the enthusiasts wanted. The also want a 429 cobra jet standard but I guess the didn't get that memo

Yeah, I heard they took the air ride suspension from the Towncar's and MkVIII's and swapped out the air bags for springs and called it a day, at least that's what someone had told me.

BigAls87Z28 09-23-2009 10:00 AM

The mark 8 has IRS. Or had I should say.
The suspension design is very familiar for third/fourth gen guys. Its damn near identical.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.