yeah man i hear ya there! i was mad that they tried pullin that B.S. on me :-x
i wasnt gonna fall for it either lol. i could tell he was mad when i didnt sign it and told him i was only getting an estimate. he crumpled up the paper

dont worry anymore about the bac test. it wont get you anything extra in whatever settlement his insurance comapny gives u for the car being hit. from that part of the report u posted, it shows you were not at fault. if you want to pm me and send a photo of the other sections of the accident report, i'll tell you what it means, and those will 99% show you were not at fault too.

yea, it sux to have the car get hit when u were not at fault.

as for giving a bac test. cops just cant go on common sense for administering the test. they have to have some type of reasonable suspicion. (such as slurring words, bloodshot eyes, odor of an alcoholic beverage, open container, or admission of drinking etc). when the officer got the statements from the driver regaring the circumstances of the crash, it is also the officers time to observe the driver for the above listed things. if the officer had no suspicion that the driver was under the influence of any type of medicine, alcohol, drug, substance, then there is no need for an exam

the guy got charged with reckless drving.. you got no charges..that is one huge indicator that u were not at fault in the crash. the bac test would not change this for any reason in dealing with insurance issues. it would only give u peace of mind to say.. my car was wrecked by a drunk jerk, instead of just a reckless jerk