|
An LT1 car? or are you joking?
|
no. he's talking about the turd gen V6.. have you been following the thread at all?
|
Quote:
it does go low 13's on 6 psi but only with a spooled up launch |
Oh I got confused, he was talking about an LT1 for a sec, and then I read his sig and figured the rest was about car #2. My bad.
|
Quote:
3.1 = 140 hp And either is capable of 17's stock with an Auto. :) - Justin |
Quote:
meh most of the 3.1 guys have a hard time breaking 17.8 then again by now all the motors are all so worn out.when i firstpicked up the car with 70k on the clock it would only turn mid low 18's |
you should quit messin around and go 90 degree
|
the 3.8 motor has a single advantage its bigger,thats all .The 60* motors are stronger by design.look at the new 3.6 di motor 300 hp.id really like to see the 3.8 guys goto 8k rpms on a stock bottom end with the exception of arp rod bolts
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3...h_100_1300.jpg http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3...h_100_1301.jpg http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3...h_100_1302.jpg |
you could get a couple more cylinders
|
Quote:
|
The HF V6 and the HV (which is now what the 2.8/3.1 is part of) are two very different engines. Just cause they share 60* angle doesnt make it better.
Just cause the Ford Mod motor is a 90* V8 doesnt make it as good as a LS1. |
Daskinnyguy ran a 16.9 in the heat of an august afternoon with a bolton 3.1 v6 firebird....
|
Quote:
but even staying in with the true series of bolton the 3500 factory heads are on par with $1,800 fully ported abbott heads for the 3.8 ported 3500 heads kill the 3.8 stuff,the only thing even better is the dohc stuff for the 60* motor but thats an assload of work to use,and also what the new di engines run. guys have been puttin out 300+ na hp with the 3.1/3.4 na with the 3500 heads untouched http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3.../FlowData3.jpg |
o jesus....when I saw you were back it made me want to hide my 3.4 sig and deny I ever had the car....still pulling 10in on the launch? I hear those 3.1 pull sick wheel stands.
|
maybe u should pay more attention and look around theres already pics of the car with wheels up,including video
|
seen em....you do those rotary style launches
|
This thread is QUALITY! :knock:
|
Quote:
|
stock is stock....who cares
90* = more torque by design and, RPM does not = faster |
Quote:
If you run one side of the engine to 8,000 rpm's and the other to 6,000 rpm's it will make more power.... the key is only ONE bank of the engine. And then, add a turbo to the other bank of the engine. Uber power! :rofl: |
Quote:
I can't wait to see how bad he ruins this LT1 |
Quote:
|
run 1
9 psi launch 5 psi and spun (not a big enough burnout) rt **** -.231 60'***** 1.94 330 *****5.561 1/8th ****8.615 mph *****80.44 1000 ****11.254 1/4 *****13.486 mph**** 101.19 car was way rich so we pulled some fuel run 2 out of the hole 5 psi and spin again (pushed threw the brakes on the line) rt ***** -.454 60 ***** 1.834 330 ***** 5.349 1/8 ***** 8.304 mph ***** 83.29 1000 ***** 10.851 1/4 ***** 13.008 mph ***** 104.65 9 psi both runs and the last run was still rich as hell but not as bad as run 1 tried to make a 3rdpass but they had shut down the staging lanes before we could hotlap the car lil more tunning and remove the front end limiters and the car will be back into the 12.s low boost this thing is headed for 11 second time slips with 18-21 psi on the small turbo and yes this was on the to small 50mm turbo not the t74 9 psi of boost VIDEO http://videos.streetfire.net/video/L...f-6d50ab2e6f32 http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j3...0917082257.jpg |
Grats. Too bad your reaction times sucked gigantic donkey ****
|
I guess with a lot of useless hard work & dedication anythings possible!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.