![]() |
Sorry sorry, just giving ya a hard time man.
|
oh im sorry now i see what is in bold
|
you didnt beat a 97 gt, you beat its driver..........and tiburans shouldnt even make a list
|
hondas/accords now i getcha, yea it really isint an accomplishment lol
|
guesstimate 1/4 time?
|
I think BiGal ran a 14 ish?
|
15.7?
|
Quote:
|
Ahh ok, I guess slower than that..
|
my 98 gt went 14.7...
|
Quote:
I just wanted to edit my post and laugh some more! :lol: |
he means a 97 gt as a 97 mustang gt? or am i dumb.
|
Quote:
Words can't even express my dismay. Paul Hogan didn't actually send you. |
Quote:
|
305 tpis can pull anywhere from high 14s to high 15s. on avg your basic lg4 is going to be a high 16 second car.
|
Quote:
|
I'm still laughing. You beat a honda civic? WOW!!!! i remember when my dad had one, it wouldn't accelerate uphill - you should be very proud!
|
haha my 3.4 V6 likes to eat civics. I consider that an accomplishment on my budget
|
Quote:
...and BTW, a well running 91-92 L98 isn't that far off from a LT1. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What? Stock for stock the "slow thirdgen" TTA would have your car in the kitchen making it a sammich.
Also, I've seen my far share of well running 91-92 Z's running 14.2-14.3's....I've also seen my fair share of LT1's running that.... |
some people suck, we tend to ignore them.
|
Quote:
My TA ran multiple 13's bone stock with 150k on the clock, as did several other members on this board... so youre arguement is null, ive also seen 15 second ls1's, and 17 second v8 third gens, you fail |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.