Would be appropriate as this is the govt running a drug program, so a govt ran car company giving a car seems logical.

That's exactly right.

Fidgit for Mascot of our camping!

1. It will make us seem more diverse.
2. We will get the midget vote!

Al gets one of those trans ams that GM is secretly building in a bunker deep down below somewhere.

So Al is covered, the midget vote is covered. We need a strong gay vote so Scott has that covered(:waits to get banned: ).

Nasty can be our Drug Enforcement Agency head so there's the stoner vote.

I think we can make this work.

Post of the year

Yeah that's signature worthy right there.

see this is why you cant argue with the conservatives like tsar. you give them logic and they just toss retarded statements at you until you have no clue what you were arguing about in the first place because they get so off base your first thought is ''wtf is this person thinking'' and forget the original topic.

Fairly certain he took you, " well guys we can make necklaces and stuff out of hemp, so lets legalize it!!" arguement.. and tore it to shred with actual logic.

lol all i saw was ignoring the monetary issues and focusing on comparing marijuana with meth, cocaine and heroin, using the slippery slope argument as his basis. which is like comparing lt1's and ls1's. sure you can lump them in the same basic category that theyre engines for a car, but have absolutely nothing in common or to do with each other.

So would the LS1 be MJ and the LT1 be meth, coke, crack etc?

Prob, meth coke and crack can ruin ones like pretty fast...

Im so high right now....

I second that!!

yeah you fail because i meant in terms of design. stand tall little man.