NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   Brake, Chassis and Suspension Tech (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   Tubular K member worth it? (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=64759)

V 03-24-2014 07:50 PM

Tubular K member worth it?
 
How necessary /useful is a tubular k member really?

The car it would be for is NOT a race car, nor a real street/strip car.
It'll be a show car and cruiser with rare trips to a track(maybe 1-2 times a year if that).

I was first considering it merely due to the ease of install, added room, and such. But once installed its not a part that I will be taking full advantage of.

By using the stock k-member with minor mods, I could save $400+.
I've been reading about fitment issues, problems using stock front control arms(which I will be), and possible cracking with street use.

LTb1ow 03-24-2014 07:58 PM

Mine makes my life real easy with fitting stuff, however it def leaves your oil pan exposed.

PolarBear 03-24-2014 08:13 PM

My opinion for a "true" street car, it isn't worth it. Spend the money and put an alarm in it :rofl:

V 03-24-2014 08:29 PM

if I use the stock one, I have to notch for the A/C and "clearance" for the oil pan.
The a/c notch is fine, but the room for the oil pan worries me, its tight. I may just have a good welder mod the back end by like an inch.

The only good tubular brand I've come across in my research is the BMR unit BUT you need to use their tubular A-arms too that that's a big extra expense($500) At that point, a bmr setup would cost more than the car did in the first place.

Jersey Mike 03-24-2014 08:51 PM

Keep it factory and have an additional set of keys cut?

PolarBear 03-24-2014 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V (Post 902561)
if I use the stock one, I have to notch for the A/C and "clearance" for the oil pan.
The a/c notch is fine, but the room for the oil pan worries me, its tight. I may just have a good welder mod the back end by like an inch.

If you're cutting/welding for the AC, how much more is the notch really? not much more work. If you WANT to spend money, get the Holley pan, plenty of room for the pan AND you can do a stock style 3rd gen Y pipe, which is what I was planning on doing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jersey Mike (Post 902563)
Keep it factory and have an additional set of keys cut?

:rofl:

Dudbird113 03-25-2014 12:00 AM

I love mine, so much more room to get to stuff.

coolmanvette75 03-25-2014 12:16 AM

I really love mine. First time I had to work on the car on my back I was amazed at how much easier it actually was to do stuff...

LTb1ow 03-25-2014 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolmanvette75 (Post 902572)
I really love mine. First time someone else had to work on the car on their back I was amazed at how much easier it actually was to do stuff...

Fixed. :bertstare:

sweetbmxrider 03-25-2014 07:15 AM

I like mine but its a 4th gen and it fit. It opens up sooo much room. I haven't had an issue street driving mine but the corners have gussets welded to them. If the holley pan clears, that sounds like a better option.

Blackbirdws6 03-25-2014 07:45 AM

Looking at mine on jack stands is nice but we will see how it does on the road. There is definitely some more room to work which is a big plus since I typically can't fit myself anywhere. I purchased the road race version due to some of the concerns you mentioned. We will see how it does.

V 03-25-2014 12:11 PM

Im gonna go about just modding the stock one. It'll be a cruiser/toy more than anything. the ls1 and hatch are already decent weight reduction. If I decide to build the motor more in a few years, i can swap to a tubular one then. I just need to look into how swap longtubes fit with the stock k. Im not supercharged or turbo so the extra room really helps me little.

ill change all the front end bushings when its all apart and paint everything nice.

chknhwk01 03-25-2014 06:59 PM

I have no problemmmm,with mine...
 
TRACK OR STREET,I HAVE A "SPOHN" ON ITS GREAT, LOTS OF ROOM NO ISHUUUUUUUU,WITH OIL PANS...:nod:

V 03-25-2014 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chknhwk01 (Post 902617)
TRACK OR STREET,I HAVE A "SPOHN" ON ITS GREAT, LOTS OF ROOM NO ISHUUUUUUUU,WITH OIL PANS...:nod:

its for a third gen first off and second off.. NO

Fast92RS 03-26-2014 08:27 AM

I had a spohn one with their tubular a arms on my third gen. It was really nice, handled well and was very easy to get the headers installed because of it and just getting to everything was a lot easier.

qwikz28 03-26-2014 01:28 PM

I debated it too, Paul. The reason I opted against it was that I couldn't justify spending the coin knowing that I would be constantly worried about it cracking and knowing my oil pan is exposed. Why pay money to worry?

Fast92RS 03-26-2014 02:08 PM

Really there is no more danger to the pan with the tubular k member. The bottom is still exposed with or without it.

V 03-26-2014 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PolarBear (Post 902566)
If you WANT to spend money, get the Holley pan, plenty of room for the pan AND you can do a stock style 3rd gen Y pipe, which is what I was planning on doing.

:rofl:

which pan? the 302 or the 301?

**edit:

I found it, the HOL-302-2. More clearance than the f body one.
Its only $350. I can probably sell the fbody one for 250 or so, so not much out of pocket considering I can leave the k member as it is, and only notch for the A/c.

PolarBear 03-26-2014 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V (Post 902691)
which pan? the 302 or the 301?

**edit:

I found it, the HOL-302-2. More clearance than the f body one.
Its only $350. I can probably sell the fbody one for 250 or so, so not much out of pocket considering I can leave the k member as it is, and only notch for the A/c.

Both those are slightly different than the pan I bought since Holley bought the design from JZ Motorworks. I have a thread on TGO about the clearance if you really want to know, I'll look later if you want. It's in the LSx board and my user is scooter over there if you want to search.

The only negative I see is that you have less oil capacity than the F-body pan, but you can slightly overfill, or run an accusump if you're running on the track.

I found it
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/lt...erent-oil.html

WildBillyT 03-26-2014 03:25 PM

I can get you the contact info for a Holley LS swap parts engineer if you need it, too.

V 03-26-2014 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PolarBear (Post 902693)
Both those are slightly different than the pan I bought since Holley bought the design from JZ Motorworks. I have a thread on TGO about the clearance if you really want to know, I'll look later if you want. It's in the LSx board and my user is scooter over there if you want to search.

The only negative I see is that you have less oil capacity than the F-body pan, but you can slightly overfill, or run an accusump if you're running on the track.

I found it
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/lt...erent-oil.html


Yea, I was reading that thread. They were talking about the 302-1 that was just coming out back then. the 302-2 is a diff design and hawks claims 5.7 Qts(6.2 with stock oil filter). http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/products/Oil-Pan%2C-GM-LS-Retro%252dfit%2C-1955%252d87-GM%7B47%7DMuscle-Car%7B47%7DClassic-Car%7B47%7DTrucks-Requiring-More-Clearance-Holley-Performance.html

302-1 and 302-2 comparison... http://www.holley.com/data/products/...302-2Comp1.jpg

Holley 302-1

http://www.improvedracing.com/images...dimensions.png


Holley 302-2 (this one is the one I'd get)


http://www.enginebuildermag.com/wp-c...ey-Oil-Pan.jpg



and STOCK F-Body pan....

http://www.ls1fc.com/images/dim_oil_...ro-910x882.jpg



302-2 vs. stock

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d5...ps7612c030.png

PolarBear 03-26-2014 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V (Post 902703)
Yea, I was reading that thread. They were talking about the 302-1 that was just coming out back then. the 302-2 is a diff design and hawks claims 5.7 Qts(6.2 with stock oil filter).
302-2 vs. stock

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d5...ps7612c030.png

Mine isnt really the 302-1 as shown on TGO, but it is close.

I haven't seen the 302-2, that's a cool pan, it's like a cross between the 302-1 and the Stock F-body. That looks like a GREAT swap pan for people who don't want to cut up crossmembers and are going to run long tubes. It also probably has a little more clearance in the front area too than the one I have.

Good choice

omarcamaro 03-26-2014 06:04 PM

the 302-2 pan is designed for 1st gen f bodies that's the one I'm using in my 67 rs

chknhwk01 03-27-2014 08:44 PM

Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..
 
I LIKE THE "CANON"PAN.ALUM,ON MY 4TH GEN,,,,:nod:
NO ISSSUUUU,AT AWE......

V 03-27-2014 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chknhwk01 (Post 902752)
I LIKE THE "CANON"PAN.ALUM,ON MY 4TH GEN,,,,:nod:
NO ISSSUUUU,AT AWE......

Honestly, I have no idea what a " 'CANON'PAN.ALUM " is nor do I see why its fit on a 4th gen is relevant to me in any way.
You do not own a third generation (1982-1992) camaro or firebird with an LSx swap, so unless you can provide LEGIBLE answers or opinions please refrain from posting in this or any of my threads. If you have applicable information, I will gladly listen and take it into consideration but just please spend some time writing it out properly along with using proper punctuation. With the manner you present yourself, it is impossible for anyone to take you seriously or put any value behind anything you try to say.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.