NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds

NJFBOA - Home of New Jersey's Camaros and Firebirds (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/index.php)
-   Lounge (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Uh oh.... 1/4 mile and 0-60 times for new camaro (http://www.njfboa.org/forums/showthread.php?t=35757)

12secondv6 07-23-2008 10:39 AM

Uh oh.... 1/4 mile and 0-60 times for new camaro
 
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=129496

3.6-liter V6
zero to 60 mph in 6.1 seconds regardless of transmission choice
V6 coupe quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds with an auto and 14.7 seconds with a manual, both at 97 mph

the V8-equipped Camaro SS outfitted with the 422-hp 6.2-liter LS3 V8 six-speed manual hits 60 mph in 4.9 seconds and runs a 13.4-second quarter-mile at 108 mph according to Oppenheiser. Strangely enough, Oppenheiser also claims that the automatic-equipped SS Camaro, which is rated at 400 hp, runs from zero to 60 mph in just 4.6 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds.

OUCH!

*ducks and hides*

BonzoHansen 07-23-2008 10:41 AM

Pretty good for not actually having a car to drive.

12secondv6 07-23-2008 10:55 AM

I expected quicker.... but Oppenheiser is some big GM guy?!?!?!

jims69camaro 07-23-2008 11:05 AM

weight reduction...

MonmouthCtyAntz 07-23-2008 11:19 AM

Guess it'll be slower then some ls1's w/ an extra 100 plus hp lol

JerzLT1 07-23-2008 11:22 AM

till GMHTP gets ahold of one and runs it till it breaks like they did with the CTSV lol

GP99GT 07-23-2008 11:28 AM

lolllllllllll

JerzyIroc 07-23-2008 11:34 AM

That's pathetic. Another reason why i hate the car...

79CamaroDiva 07-23-2008 12:01 PM

Maybe they need to get someone who can drive a manual :lol:

r0nin89 07-23-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva (Post 467845)
Maybe they need to get someone who can drive a manual :lol:

Yeah right? Whats the deal I always thought that if you could drive stick very well youd only be a hair slower than an automatic counterpart.

79CamaroDiva 07-23-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by r0nin89 (Post 467859)
Yeah right? Whats the deal I always thought that if you could drive stick very well youd only be a hair slower than an automatic counterpart.

if you drive a stick very well, you'll be quicker than an automatic counterpart. Autos rob power, manuals are meant to be beaten ;)

BonzoHansen 07-23-2008 01:21 PM

I thought I heard where the new 6 speed autos shift very quickly....

jims69camaro 07-23-2008 02:15 PM

even with firmer/quicker shifts, by design the auto loses power over a manual. it's like a manual with the clutch engaged to some degree all of the time.

cdacda13 07-23-2008 02:19 PM

Not bad for a boat.

sweetbmxrider 07-23-2008 02:33 PM

thats depressing. i'll stick with my lt1 for now.

Squirrel 07-23-2008 02:47 PM

so my stock beat to **** lt1 was less than a half second away...bahahaha

BrandonDrecksage 07-23-2008 02:50 PM

not bad times for the v6, can't wait till a real driver gets a hold of the ss.

Ian 07-23-2008 06:06 PM

GMHTP got a ls1 4th gen into the 12's with less power, I dont see why they wouldnt be able to knock off a high 12 with this car. if all else fails, let j0n drive it :lol:

BonzoHansen 07-23-2008 06:22 PM

We all know it is a tune away from 12s - just like the G8.

The last part of the article caught my attention:

Both versions of the V8 Camaro SS pull a maximum 0.90 g on the skid pad. Four-piston Brembo brakes help stop the Camaro SS in 117 feet.

What this means to you: If Chevrolet's numbers pan out, the Camaro SS will be every bit as fast as the Dodge Challenger SRT8 for a lot less money. — Kelly Toepke, News Editor

Anti_Rice_Guy 07-23-2008 06:23 PM

.90 g? didn't 4th gens pull .92?

SteveR 07-23-2008 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian (Post 468054)
GMHTP got a ls1 4th gen into the 12's with less power, I dont see why they wouldnt be able to knock off a high 12 with this car. if all else fails, let j0n drive it :lol:

500 more pounds is why its slower.

Anti_Rice_Guy 07-23-2008 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveR (Post 468074)
500 more pounds is why its slower.

Also 100 more hp....My mom's Suburban has 100 more hp, and more than 1000 lbs on my Explorer...still faster. :lol:

Frosty 07-23-2008 07:28 PM

I'm not getting mad yet until A) More tests are done and B) It hits the track driven by every day people.

I'm still disappointed with it's weight. I still hate the interior lol

79CamaroDiva 07-23-2008 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian (Post 468054)
GMHTP got a ls1 4th gen into the 12's with less power, I dont see why they wouldnt be able to knock off a high 12 with this car. if all else fails, let j0n drive it :lol:

eff gmhtp, I got my ls1 into the 12s :lol:

BonzoHansen 07-23-2008 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 79CamaroDiva (Post 468120)
eff gmhtp, I got my ls1 into the 12s :lol:

gmhtp is FTL anyway.


Therefore you are ftw. :lol:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.