BigAls87Z28 |
03-18-2013 09:14 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
(Post 874959)
|
First off, thanks for the link-back brah.
This will be the top, non-V engine. Base engine for the CTS will be the 2.0T, than the 3.6, than this. This is to go head to head with the Germans/Japanese's V8 engines.
The ATS-V will have a slightly more powerful version of this engine. This will also go into the XTS sedan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Mike
(Post 874975)
MPG numbers are a little weak. Doesn't MB have a bi-turbo already?
Agreed though, a TTV6 CTS is a good move. There should be a "smoother" transition between a base CTS and a CTSV.
8-speed auto?!? Not sure if I like that, but I'm sure the genpop will drool over that stat.
|
MPG is in line with the V8 variants of everything else in it's class. MPGs are not that big of a deal then.
MB and BMW have twin-turbo V8s that make around the same power as this TTV6. BMW's 4.4TT is larger and makes less power than the LF3.
The 8spd auto is an Aisin unit, not the GM unit which will come later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
(Post 874977)
keep in mind that the next cts is getting bigger for the next gen so 420hp would be respectable. its only 100hp more in a heavier car.
|
Next CTS will be slightly larger, but lighter than the current one. Driving this will be similar to driving your CTS-V.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Huryk
(Post 874979)
That looks to be an internally upgraded and turbo charged 3.6L - same engine as in my 2011 LaCrosse, think it is rated at 320hp NA in some versions. Heard they are sticking this in the upcoming Grand National and GNX versions of the Regal - 4wd drivetrain.
|
There is no talk of putting this is the proposed Alpha Buick, but it's possible.
|