View Single Post
Old 03-19-2005, 01:05 PM   #13
Pat
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: So Bruns
Posts: 543
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokingSS
yeah but back in the 60's $54 was more like $540 today. I just see it as a marketing scheme, stick an engine in it and slap on ss badges and a billet grille outline. your gonna get a lot of idiots with that trailblazer screwing around and ending up on their roof, but thats their problem. I just think the SS badge should be used with a little restraint. hell make up a new abbreviation, or something. Even ford got carried away with the GT, putting it on the probe, escort, focus and others. I'm sorry, but back in the day GT like SS meant a whole different thing. thats all just my opinion, and how im gonna feel, if they make the cars handle like an "ss" should then fine.
it is and always has been a marketing scheme. they've ALWAYS put ss badges on everything. ****, the 4th gen camaro ss was just a z28 with a hood and wheels. the only reason ss's and firehawks made more power was a lid and a catback.

remember the 80's MC ss's? what did they have, an lg4? come on, 180 hp or something.
__________________
Formerly SilverTransAm

Sold: 1998 Trans Am
SLP Lid, Magnaflow Catback, Stock Hurst w/ JSS, BMR APHR, Chrome ZR1's

Currently Driving: 1986 Oldsmobile Delta 88
Parents bought it from my neighbor's father for $500
Pat is offline   Reply With Quote