Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ****OnWheels
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trans Am Chick
what i think is completelly revolting is that terry can eat and at the best she should be comferted in her last days. the husband got a restraining order against the parents because he caught the mother trying to put <a style='text-decoration: none; border-bottom: 3px double;' href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=22&k=lip%20gloss" onmouseover="window.status='lip gloss'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;">lip gloss</a> on because terry was so dehydrated. that is going to far. im not sure i agree completelly with them taking the feeding tube out. but i can understand her husbands pov. they dont need to go the to the extreme to keep her alive but at the same time i cannot believe he ordered for her to not be fed at all or to be able to have water or ice chips. nothing. thats horrible. and thats y i think the husband is a scumbag. Â*not to mention... hes still married to her wtf is he doing with another woman. call me old fashioned. but thats wrong. if she cannot survive on her own without medical help, then yes she should be let go. but that doesnt mean that they can deny her sustinence until she reaches that point.
|
Well, how does one let her go when the feeding tube was the only thing keeping her alive? Â*She can breathe on her own, and her heart beats on its own, so pulling a respirator isn't an option. Â*And since euthanasia is illegal, can't give her a lethal injection. Â*So the only real way is to take the tube out. Â*It probably could be considred uncruel punishment or undue pain and sufferring, but it really is the only option. |
like i said i havent decided if i agree with them taking the feeding tube out or not. but i definatelly disagree with them denying any type of food and water. i understand she cannot feed herself and im sure that she cant chew but denying anything inclunding chapstick? thats insane.