Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
There is nothing "shared" with DCX. They downright jacked the Gen III engine design.
GM's DoD and DCX's MDS are a little different I belive. I think that MDS doesnt colapse the lifter, just shuts off a bank of injectors. DoD shuts down both.
Not to mention the engine design for the hemi.
Hemi my ass....
|
Nope, they do the same thing, both lock the lifters off the cam lobe AND shut down the fuel. There are a few things I still don't understand about DOD but I'm getting my answeres slowely enough through a couple sources. I'll have all my questions answered mid May when I go to the FSAE competition and talk to the GM engineers in person.
You could say that they jacked it but I don't believe it. Both knew exactly what the other was doing and through shared research (by SAE members and papers) they got what they needed from a technical standpoint. Then the R&D was all done seperately. It's just like all the inline 4-cylinders with 16v, they didn't SHARE the D in R&D, just a bunch of the R

.
Also, the hemi isn't an EXACT classic hemi chamber but it is very close. The valves aren't cantered on a 3D vector, only 2D, but it's still an excellent power maker with that exhaust valve angle. I bet those engines could be sweet talked into making 600hp n/a with just some nice bolt ons and a little porting.
__________________
, Jon
Owner of a Red Sled.
If it\'s EFI I can tune it. Specialize in 82-95 GM (yes Lt1\'s)
\"If you can leave black marks on a straight from the time you exit a corner till the time you brake for the next turn.......Then, you have enough horsepower\" - Mark Donohue