Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fasterthanyou
So let's get some things straight... ignoring everything other than the powertrain we're looking at 505 hp from a naturally aspirated cam in block v8? And were are Ford's BLOWN v8's? Yeah, Ford sucks, I mean blows when it comes to making bad ass horsepower. Imagine if you would, a turbo on the LS7... yeah, let's just let that sink in.
0-60mph in 3.7 in 1st gear  , that's insane. |
compression ratio on the LS7 is 11:1. a turbo won't be going on there unless the compression is dropped, which lowers the power.
of course, it won't be TOO much of a power loss....and the turbo would more than make up for it.
now, why stop at a turbo? why not twin-turbo?  |
You've been brainwashed
. You can run a turbo on a 11:1 static compression ratio engine if the other parts match. Get the intake valve to stay open longer during the compression stroke and you're dynamic compression ratio would be well below that of a "low compression" engine.
Also, why twin-turbo? Last time I checked the singles were the setups putting the most power to the wheels and for good reason. Unless you've got a flat-crank v8 or some ultra fancy cross-over headers for your twin turbo there is no way possible for a twin to be more efficient than a single. I'd take a well designed single over a twin in a heartbeat. The twin just sounds cool :P
I don't know about the IRS. To me it doesn't take an IRS to make a sports car, although it does help. IRS just tells me it's better for handling the crappy roads
. Smooth and the IRS has very little advantage over a solid rear.
What does this car do in the 1/4 mile if it's doing 0-60 in 3.7s. That's gotta be well into the 11's if not better.
__________________
, Jon
Owner of a Red Sled.
If it\'s EFI I can tune it. Specialize in 82-95 GM (yes Lt1\'s)
\"If you can leave black marks on a straight from the time you exit a corner till the time you brake for the next turn.......Then, you have enough horsepower\" - Mark Donohue
