View Single Post
Old 07-20-2005, 10:38 PM   #25
Savage_Messiah
2007 Member of the Year
 
Savage_Messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seabrook, TX
Posts: 14,281
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by foff667
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Exactly, GM doesnt have an Fbdoy, so they suck and they are horrible and dont know performance.
GM cannot get credit where credit is due. They make awesome performance vehicles. Just because YOU cant afford them doesnt mean that they suck. Outside of the Mustang, what does Ford have to really give you a thrill? Any 400hp or 440hp Linc's or Merc's?
Any 500hp cars from Chrysler that are under 70k?

The 300, Charger and Magnum are OVER 30k for a 340hp Hemi, and a GTO is 32k, and you get 400hp...and its a coupe, not a station wagon or a sedan. And the interior quality is much higher.
The Mustang GT offers LT1 performance in a 40 year old wrapper with a third gen suspension. I gotta pay 28k for one of thoes?

Again...its bad bad bad for GM. GM sucks because they dont offer an Fbody, a car that you really couldnt get unless it was a 30k SS. I forgot how affordable they really where.
(Insert everyone who got there stripper Z28's for a under 20k)

Please, spare me the crap. Camaro is coming, but Im sure everyone will make a biiiiig hissy becaue it doesnt look like a 69 Camaro. I wonder if everyone will get upset that there isnt a 454 carb with either a 3spd TH350 or a 4spd M22 option.
we all love you Al...everyone lets give al a big hug whatdoyasay guys its ok man. Now calm the **** down lol


gm = crap
__________________
WF=DF

Kommandant
of the ACL (Anti Canadian League)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTb1ow View Post
Junk the pos, spend the money on beer, acquire headache.

Same result cept this headache doesnt last months.
Savage_Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote