Quote:
Originally Posted by 2001orangess
cylinder Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*result
1 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 165
2 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 160
3 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 165
4 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 160
5 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 165
6 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 155
7 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*45
8 Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* 160
|
hmmm, those seem terribly high. i say lower the compression down until they all match #7. less cyl pressure means less strain on connecting rods, pistons, and the crank :P
sorry to hear about the trouble with the motor. sounds like a good excuse for a big inch LSx from TTP with a healthy cam and head combination
later
tim