[jims69camaro]

i don't like the wording:

[a gift is] an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee.

so if some chick gives me crabs i should say thank you for the gift? this is wrong, A) to B) - i mean, we all know the chick was a lying manipulative capital C-word, why doesn't the court see it that way? i understand the child support thing, the only thing that has to be proved there is paternity and once the test came back positive that dude was effed for the next 18 years. yeah, given the cirCUMstances (sorry, couldn't resist) a court should be able to get him out of that and get what he's already paid refunded. man, what a waste of space this gaping, festering slam-hole is. what will women think up next?