View Single Post
Old 02-16-2006, 08:31 PM   #57
curt86iroc
 
curt86iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: nj/pa
Posts: 273
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrek
The rear mount turbo is just as efficient, if not more, read the info...there is no need for the intercooler, it still makes the power, and you can safely run larger amounts of boost with out too many problems...this is my opinion, but i'd rather go turbo than blower, and rather go rear than front...but who the hell am i right?

Shrek
a rear mount is in no way as efficient as a front mount. remember, the longer you pump a fluid, the more frictional loss will occur. if you look at a front and rear mount turbo, both with the same rotor diameter, rpm and flow rate, the front mount will be more "efficient."

now, if you are talking mechanical eficiency (which i do not think you are) then you are correct. the mechanical efficiencies would be equal.
__________________
1990 IROC-Z - L98 G92 and some go fast goodies
1999 Blazer - ZR2 and some off road goodies
curt86iroc is offline   Reply With Quote