View Single Post
Old 02-24-2006, 07:33 PM   #31
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob WS6
Exactly, why would GM want to make a car look nice to impress a few "enthusiasts" right? Cut me a break with the holier-than-thou GM **** already, its getting old.

the car that was sold actually market tested and was reviewe better than the concept car. it was a mass appeal car with solid performance, comfort, and value.
if GM ever had any thoughts of making it similar to the old GTO it would have been available stripped down and extremely plain jane othr than some badging. that is what the original muscle car was, a lightweight with excess power. the new GTO was intended to sell to the spirit of the original muscle cars, not be a throw back to one
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote