View Single Post
Old 05-30-2006, 11:14 PM   #39
qwikz28
13 Second Club / Moderator
 
qwikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Posts: 8,694
iTrader: (6)
Social Networks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebirdgm2000
funny some of you guys are so adamant on dismissing hydro-gen so quickly but you failed to read up on this in other forums. I've heard the results are flawless, knowing full well it works and picks up more horsepower..... It works by electrostatic charges into the intake hence (hydrogen) extracting those molecules from tap water and baking soda (a very light amount of it)..... Keeps the carbon down in the engine and runs cleaner, how can that be beat..... I'm only getting 20mpg right now anyways. I've also done the seafoam thing (really only works on higher mileage cars)... no big difference if you dont have anymore than 60k miles
what does static repulsion have anything to do with this? there is no way to "extract" molecules without another subtance to interact with it, and that must create enough energy to reach its activation energy and that would probably require more energy then it produces. and that is also a pain in the ass. scientifically it is completely crappy
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1ow View Post
Except Jersey mike, great kid, but the way he looks at me makes me feel like im in danger
qwikz28 is offline