I like how in the entire news story, they dont say what they found or if they were left overs from 1991
and as for how saddam ran his country, do you think you could do any better? when a country is in a constant state of civil unrest steps have to be taken to preserve the peace. Sometimes you have to show force to get the point across.
I don't agree with what saddam did, but it seemed to keep the middle east pretty calm. no one type of government works the best in every situation, if that were the case there would only be one type of government. For most of the middle east, a democracy wont work yet we are trying to force it upon them as if we know whats best for people living on the other side of the planet in a completely different situation than our own.
As much as you all hate it, Clinton was a better president. he left the whitehouse with no threats of war, we had a national surplus and the stock market and economy was doing pretty well. Enter Bush. Now we have an economy that can be likened to that of the great depression, a war on "terrorism" that we will never win and $8,442,959,662,084.53 worth of national debt. each person in this country would have to pay $28,159.11 to clear it and the deficit increases an average of 1.69 billion dollars a day since september 30th of 2005.
so to sum it all up, we have no business in the middle east unless it is to actually apprehend extremists who pose a tangible threat to us. That and Bush is the worst president ever. Thanks for ****ing all the little people while you and your buddies make millions....no really.....thank you so much for screwing the very country I grew up loving.