Thread: Help me find...
View Single Post
Old 02-15-2007, 02:45 PM   #9
NJSPEEDER
NJFBOA Co-Founder
 
NJSPEEDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: All up in your kool aid!
Posts: 12,235
iTrader: (10)
i wouldn't get too hung up on the D-port thing. the bolt pattern is the same as a standard small block and all you really need to do is trim the gasket back to match the exhaust port. the header tubing al turns round at some point anyway, why not right at the flange
i know it sounds like a lame fix, big in the dyno testingi have seen the only engines that are sensitive to tradition vs d-port headers seem to be the old poncho's



Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrel View Post
s10v8.com...hm...
please please please don't be one of THOSE guys. the s-10 v8 thing has been done so many times and the results in performance are ssssoooooo pitiful. f-bodies have a bad enough front to rear weight distribution, that should be leson enough in balance, but to throw a little bitty pick up bed over the rear makes it even worse.

hey, there is a clean looking(at 40mph drive by) 86ish monte ss near the west trenton 7-11 for sale. maybe you coudl chuck the LT1 + T56 in that.
__________________
Tim - NJSPEEDER
Currently F-bodyless

New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
NJSPEEDER is offline   Reply With Quote