Quote:
Originally Posted by hardline_42
NightRyda, what type of driving do you plan for your car? Everyone seems to be ignoring the suspension effects of significantly shortening the TQ arm like the chassis mount type does. Unless you absolutely need the extra anti-squat that you'll get from the shorter arm, I would think that the increased brake hop would not be worth it on a daily driver. If you check with the road racing and autox guys, they are actually using decoupled TQ arms ( http://unbalancedengineering.com/Camaro/TA/) that improve anti squat without sacrificing braking and safety. If you're interested in all around better performance, my suggestion would be a UMI relocation kit to take the mounting point off the trans and a stock length tubular TQ arm. The UMI piece also has several mounting points to help you adjust pinion angle if you lower the suspension. |
it will be an all-around car. I want as much handeling as HP. It will see some strip use (mostly f'in around on the weekends), but mostly a cruzer.
the relocation bracket and stock lenght arm; will they clear headers and the associated y-pipe setup (probably KOOKS)?
__________________
The only place "stock" belongs is on store shelves; tweak that b*tch!!!
Eff Dr. Phil; my M6 SS is the only Therapist I need!
Light travels faster then sound; that is why some people appear to be smart until they speak - Unknown