Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
Camaro and Challenger are aimed at different parts of the same market segment. Camaro is for the sporty muscle car shopper and the Challenger is aimed at the luxury muscle car shopper. Prices, mileage, and insurance are in the same range for the most part.
The Challenger is a beautiful car, as is the new Camaro. Just accept them for what they are, the two extremes of the same spectrum for a single market segment.
|
couldn't agree more. both cars are great, but the camaro is more sports oriented while the challenger is more luxury coupe oriented. i will admit that both are heavy BUT THAT IS A SIGN OF THE TIMES. WITH THE NEW SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND LUXURY DEMANDS, THIS IS HOW HEAVY CARS WILL BE FROM NOW ON. IS THAT SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND? ok i'm done with that rant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveR
I don't think the Mustang is that bad, it sure handles a million times better than my 4th gen ever did. And Ford managed to make it 500 pounds lighter than both the Camaro and Challenger. And $5000 less. And make it appealing to women.
|
the mustang served its purpose and served it well. it was never meant to excel, it was meant to be an above average car that looked great, and was cheap. in that respect, i don't see how ford failed in teh slightest.
Mustang- muscle car for the masses
Camaro- muscle car king of the ring
Challenger- the big luxurious sexy throwback muscular coupe.
pick your poison.