View Single Post
Old 02-19-2009, 06:52 PM   #52
Tsar
MIR
 
Tsar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,692
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyblazer87 View Post
She might sue for some b/s about being embarrassed or something. Whatever legal term that can be used here. It just seems like people these days just want to get things for doing nothing, is all that I am saying. Why would this lady go to the press and make it more of an embarrassing moment in her life? There has to be some good reason for it.
You' re thinking of Intentional infliction of emotional distress or IIED.

She would lose because she would need all of the following to prove it.
1. Defendant acted intentionally or recklessly; and
2. Defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous; and
3. Defendant’s act is the cause of the distress; and
4. Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant’s conduct.
Tsar is offline   Reply With Quote