Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrel
wait... wait... wait... do you mean performance wise, or sales?
|
while there might have been a time when BOOK number dictated the rustnag as a better performance vehicle, the fight is long from over. i won't debate book numbers with anyone, as it's easy to put out X number of horsepower - a much different story to get it to the ground. if there are numbers that prove stock vs. stock that the rustnag was a better performing vehicle, there are numbers to prove stock vs. stock with comparable drivers that the camaro was a better performing vehicle - no matter what track you put them on. that dang torque arm did wonders for the camaro.
if you are going to argue which vehicle was a better base for launching a performance vehicle in terms of modifications, i think the rustnag loses again. of course, that is my opinion, not stating it as fact.
except for the first and maybe second generation, i think the camaro beats the rustnag in the looks department, too. again, that's my opinion and i am not stating it as a fact.
also, need i remind you of the rustnag II? yeah, who stepped on their dingus with that one?