View Single Post
Old 04-16-2009, 08:12 PM   #20
BigAls87Z28
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Long Branch
Posts: 13,598
iTrader: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TPI Monte SS View Post
. I'm 5'3", and could get comfortable and not look like a midget. The seats are very supportive, and the gauges are super nice. The only "oddball" thing is having to look down near the center console for the fuel/volts/oil/temp gauges, but that's how it was in '69. I was even able to stuff my 5-year old son in the back seat and he was comfy.
The Camaro has a lot of things, but it sure doesnt have magic Steve.

Coolant and Fuel are in the IP. The four guages are volt, trans temp, oil pressure, and oil temp I belive.
Seats are VERY good. Cant wait to see if they will swap out into the third gen. The cloth and leathe seats have the same shape, and both hold you down.



To Slo, you are about performance and about not paying a bunch for it. You are about having the baddest car on the block.
Camaro is that, sir.
Ford cannot offer a 400hp+ engine unless you spend over 40k. Challenger's 400hp+ car cost around 40k as well.
Camaro gives you 426hp for 31k. Along with Brembo brakes that give you best in class braking. Along with super strong IRS and agile IFS with variable rate steering rack and pinion.
So, do you really want a Challenger?? Lets get the paperwork started. /salesman
__________________
2/20/2013: They Day the ****s Stopped
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote