So because someone is young you tag them with a "warning" to other drivers because peers in their age group feel invincible?
You know what, I hope someone causes an accident trying to avoid a vehicle that had one of those stickers on it, I really do.
I petition we mark ANYONE that had had a DUI before, after all they very well could be drunk and could cause an accident. Next we'll sticker someone who has received a ticket for talking on a cell phone while driving, after all they very well could repeat that action and cause an accident because they're talking on it again. After we're done that we'll sticker anyone that had had more than 2 accidents in their lives, I mean they must be an accident magnet and very well could put my life in danger.
My example may be a little extreme but what's to stop that? I mean if a "statistic" gets out of control then why not?
...and yes that younger driver IS innocent, they committed no crime, broke no law, violated no rule. Maybe DMV should get rid of their ridiculous "ok, lets drive around a quiet side street" test and take these kids out on 295 or 130 during rush hour, THAT'S a driving test.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shownomercy
I agree. 100%
|
Didn't you just have to go to court and get a ticket reduced for doing something you shouldn't have been doing?
