View Single Post
Old 04-18-2009, 05:27 PM   #117
jims69camaro
Avatar Abuser
 
jims69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 08721-1716
Posts: 5,056
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
so you oppose a law that helps enforce another?
yes. there are too many laws on the books now that they can't/don't enforce. more law will not solve the problem. law enforcement, on the other hand, will. hire more policemen. have them trained by the best of the older generation. pay them something to cut down on the temptation of corruption. then cut them loose, aimed at enforcing the laws that are already on the books. you'd be surprised what could be done if all they did was enforce the current laws.

see, laws are becoming nothing more than ink on paper. hardly worth the time it took to type it up because no one is going to enforce it. so, yes, i oppose a law that helps enforce another because you will end up with another law on the books that police don't have the time/will-power/payroll hours to enforce. given the current conditions, and the finite number of hours a cop works, would you rather a cop works a murder investigation or making sure that little johnny and susie are not driving after dark/with a bunch of their 17 year old friends in the ca? it's safe to say that if a cop doesn't have time for the current law he won't have time for a law that helps enforce a law he doesn't have the time to enforce in the first place...
__________________
JSFBOA


Save a life.

N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
jims69camaro is offline