View Single Post
Old 05-25-2009, 09:25 PM   #22
madness410
 
madness410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somerset, NJ
Posts: 4,223
iTrader: (5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jam View Post
eh. ^^^ would you rather have sharp kidney pain or to fly out your window and hit a tree? that's why its so imperative to click your seatbelt in. but I do agree that it's absurd to have a law forcing us to do so
well i mean for 3-4 minutes to relieve some pain, plus the way she was driving, 2 or 3 mph over the speed limit and where we were odds of getting into an accident like that would be just about the odds of you getting struck by lightning while holding a winning powerball ticket.

Quote:
Originally Posted by my82roc View Post
Im tired of giving extra revenue to a state for something that should be your own personal choice.
i believe the state does it to lower costs to other people, not mainly for your own personal safety. figure you get rear ended by someone and you arent wearing your seatbelt and your face gets smashed into the windsheild, the medical bills would be high and the person who rear ended you would have to go through their insurance to pay for your medical bill. but if you were wearing your seatbelt odds are that wouldnt happen and the person who caused the accident wouldnt need to pay a severe medical bill. or something like that.
__________________
Jon
1999 Trans am WS6
1996 Corvette LT4 6 speed
madness410 is offline   Reply With Quote