Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
I totally agree, it is there to w/d when needed. You should use it as it is intended, I certainly would. The point BIlly & I were making is when people decide not to use belts it impacts more than just the person not wearing the belt. It makes that pot you are forced to throw $ into bigger.
|
Yeah, that's it. Nothing more, nothing less. Not looking to cruicify anybody, just throwing some facts out.
As an example, if somebody with basic coverage has a kid who is not wearing their belt gets into a nasty accident and the kid is in a coma, who pays the massive medical expenses? You and I do, one way or the other. If the kid were to belt up and the expenses were 1/2 of what they would be without the belt, then that's good for everyone involved.