View Single Post
Old 07-28-2009, 10:42 AM   #10
jims69camaro
Avatar Abuser
 
jims69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 08721-1716
Posts: 5,056
iTrader: (0)
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knipps View Post
yeah, this is nothing new guys
you two! constantly reminding us that we're living in the past. "move on, douglas."

(bonus points if you can tell me the TV show that quote is from)

it's been a problem, and with the TV makers adding in more post-processing, it will continue to be a problem. i prefer the raw signal, let me decide what to do with it. i've almost got the audiophile's dream system: everything comes in through my receiver first, then it goes to the end-user electronic item. like with the cable-TV signal, first it goes through my receiver, then on to the TV, so i can mute the TV's on-board electronics and process the audio signal how i like to hear it. of course there are things wrong with that type of setup, too, in that you are introducing "noise" into the cable's picture signal. not much, way less than the public's accepted .005% THD, but it's still there. much less aware of it now that the signal is digital.
__________________
JSFBOA


Save a life.

N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
jims69camaro is offline   Reply With Quote