[thunder]

Originally Posted by BonzoHansen

Argh, this may be the dumbest thread in the past 6 months! I just saw 6 pages and decided to read it. What a load of numbnuts we have here. There is so much stupid in this thread I had to take notes.

Different strokes for different folks, well said.

There is nothing wrong with liking/owning/talking about other makes/models of cars. There are some Mustangs that are better than Camaros. The new mustang holds a nice weight advantage over the SUV-tire clad and bloated Camaro. Get over it. It is also ok to not like other makes/models of cars. The new Mustang is ugly, especially the back of it. The new SUV-tire clad and bloated Camaro looks nicer to me.

One exception. Anyone that thinks a late model mustang looks better than a 1969 COPO Camaro should be banned for being a total idiot and have his eyes checked.

New guy: Really? Gerbil jokes? Good lord. And the big font, please.

Al: There was a Z28 in 1974 as well as 1977. Also **** you late 2nd gens are great. Go buy some fender flares for that 3rd gen you got.

Tsar: Yes, Melissa calls you Vitals too.

NastyLS1: Live axles are as ancient as leaf springs. However both can be quite effective. And judging by the track record of live axles in 3rd & 4th gens your argument is terrible at best. Also, you should never argue automotive history, you are wrong probably 99% of the time. One more thing, a bennie cannot call another person a bennie. If you live in Hamilton you are no less a bennie/shoobie than someone from Philly or Bergen. Dumbass.

Kasey: FTW

Now, getting back on topic, the pictures in the 1st post are stupid. Whoever had that idea should be banned from thinking ever again.

laying the smack down on some candy arses