[Slow-V6]

Originally Posted by JL8Jeff

Winning percentage is meaningless if you can't win a championship. We all remember the Bills because of their 4 super bowl wins, right!

-

So if you dont win a superbowl you would rather have a team that doesnt have a winning record? I dont get it? Would you rather have a team like TB that won the SB in 2002 and since have not been in the running? I guess you would rather be like a team like the Redskins who won there last superbowl in what 1991?Since then what have they done? Hell I was 10 yrs old the last time the skins were in an NFC championship. I was 27yrs old the last time the Eagles were in the NFC Championship. Thats what matters to me. Being able to enjoy the playoffs and not looking back 20yrs and saying ( well at least we won a superbowl). I was to young and I bet there are certain people on this site who were not even born yet when a so called winning team like the Skins, won the Superbowl or even made it to the NFC Championship game!!

Originally Posted by Squirrel

def. agree on mcnabb, akers, and dawkins no question... but i would say that brown and lewis give vincent a run... and staley and maybe even watters give westbrook competition, especially since they were the offense, back when the eagles were a predominant run team (before nabber)

I dont think Westbrook is the best RB the eagles ever had. He is the best Rb as per Stats!! I liked Watters and the Thunder and lightning better. I do think Vincent is the best CB and maybe Eric Allen back in the 80's as well!!