View Single Post
Old 04-09-2010, 12:26 PM   #34
BonzoHansen
Admin.
 
BonzoHansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 20,165
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NastyEllEssWon View Post
thats the point. when a company offers a v6 base car that CAN BE COMPARED to the competitors top of the line v8 car you have a problem that 8 hp isnt going to fix.
So the base camaro is a few ticks off their best and that is somehow bad for GM? Huh. The problem is on the ford side, and they are addressing that with the 2010 5.0 car, no?

Looks like this to me:

http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/mustang/pricing/
Mustang V6 22245
Mustang V6 Premium 25245
Mustang GT 28745
Mustang GT Premium 31745
Mustang GT500 47575

V6: 210 hp 16/24
V8: 315 hp 17/23

http://www.chevrolet.com/vehicles/2010/camaro/build.do
camaro LS V6 22680
camaro 1LT V6 23880
camaro 2LT V6 26875
camaro 1SS V8 30945
camaro 2SS V8 33945

V6: 304-hp 3.6L V6 engine 17/29
V8: 426-hp 6.2L V8 16/24
__________________
Vent Windows Forever!

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand. Or so I have read.

Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold. I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors.

Hey everybody, it's good to have you on the Baba-too-da-ba-too-ba-ba-buh-doo-ga-ga-bop-a-dop
BonzoHansen is offline   Reply With Quote