Quote:
Originally Posted by BonzoHansen
So the base camaro is a few ticks off their best and that is somehow bad for GM? Huh. The problem is on the ford side, and they are addressing that with the 2010 5.0 car, no?
Looks like this to me:
http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/mustang/pricing/
Mustang V6 22245
Mustang V6 Premium 25245
Mustang GT 28745
Mustang GT Premium 31745
Mustang GT500 47575
V6: 210 hp 16/24
V8: 315 hp 17/23
http://www.chevrolet.com/vehicles/2010/camaro/build.do
camaro LS V6 22680
camaro 1LT V6 23880
camaro 2LT V6 26875
camaro 1SS V8 30945
camaro 2SS V8 33945
V6: 304-hp 3.6L V6 engine 17/29
V8: 426-hp 6.2L V8 16/24 |
im speaking of the new 5.0 and the new v6 that ford is using. saying they have overstepped the camaro in terms of performance and packaging. the spread from v6 to v8 in chevy's stable just isnt good enough. the v6 mustang is only a few ticks off of chevys top of the line camaro. which if you ask me is a very bad thing for chevy/gm.
the top of the line mustang GT 5.0 outperforms the camaro for 4 grand less. chevy needs a top of the line model to justify the performance of their v8 models at the moment.
