View Single Post
Old 09-10-2010, 08:41 AM   #24
Blacdout96
 
Blacdout96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Galloway, NJ
Posts: 3,964
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBillyT View Post
I was really referring to the OP.

But regarding your post, how old exactly is the chassis design of the 4th gen cars? Go by that. By the 4th generation, the F body was a zombie platform. There, I said it.
You mean a 35 year old chassis design, and really 20 years with swappable suspension parts (82-92)using 100 year old rear end technology (solid rear axle) a bad weight distribution, weak rear, trans, and squeeky body/ interior panels, and weight issues? nah dude, thats good for another 10, maybe 20 years tops. lol
__________________
1996 Camaro C/S - 2/3 Corvette Engine




Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28 View Post
Uh yeah, after they surprized buttsecks us at Pearl Harbor?
Blacdout96 is offline   Reply With Quote