Quote:
Originally Posted by 7998
Sorry but it is just not impressive.
A $56K Electro Magnetic computer aided forced induction ZL1 beating a old school suspension Boss LS that is derived from a 9 year old chassis by 2 seconds is not my idea of "WOW".
Sorry I just expected more out of a Camaro named ZL1.
|
Yes, what is more impressive is a 9 year old chassis, jammed with a forced induction engine, with no major suspension upgrades to handle an increase of 100hp, which it couldn't handle before, and no major brake upgrade.
THAT'S wayyy more impressive. Can't wait to see how well it does.
nah nah, you trollin
Quote:
|
I've owned 9 F-body's, 30+GM vehicles, I'm a fan
|
Oh, that makes this all better.
Quote:
|
I'm just not afraid to call them out.
|
Call them out on what, exactly? It is an impressive car by any random performance matrix you can come up with. Just because it doesn't lay down 10 sec quarter miles makes not impressive? The car is very impressive, just like the Boss is VERY impressive. Your self-made performance matrix is ******** and until you put the car through the paces and drive them, all we can really talk about is how nice the ZL1 drives around town compared to the rather jarring experience when you drive a Boss LS or a GT500. The ZL1 is a great car because it does so many things very well, and it's pretty fast to boot.
Quote:
|
I pained me a little to pick a new 5.0 over a 5th Gen even though the Camaro was cheaper. Even still I had to buy what I thought was the best all around car.
|
This is the only sense you have made in all your posts in this section. The Mustang GT is a better driving car than the Camaro SS, no doubt about it. Power, poise, steering, road feel, etc etc. Camaro is more civil around town, but I would trade some civility for some better steering and response from the Mustang.
Your opinion may vary.