[LTb1ow]

Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28

Bonzo tore the fbody argument apart, but let me pee in your corn flakes on your "doesn't say American muscle".
First off, Australia has a longer and stronger history of muscle cars than American has. Think of Australia as America if the 70's didn't happen. Ford, GM(Holden), Nissan all have rear-drive, V8 powered cars, including coupes, sedans, wagons, and utes. America? Home of the pick up truck and the Camry.

As for not-American-made, the Challenger would be based on a modified version of an old Mercedes chassis and the Mustang can trace its origins of development from a joint-venture with Jag.





Ahhhhhhhh....yeah. We will see how Camaro's sales dip when the SS gets here I guess.



what's considered an F-car? Realize that a 67 Camaro has very little in common with a 77 Camaro, not to mention an 87 or 97? If you want to talk about design, that gets even worse! No generation Camaro looks like the previous Camaro. If ANY generation looks like an "fbody car", it's the current one.

If you don't like it, that's okay and I understand. But your logic is flawed.



As a third gen owner, I think it's perfectly acceptable.



That's what he was saying. We are living in the best time to own a performance car in the history of the automobile. There is a 662hp Mustang that doesn't have a gas-guzzler tax on it, it didn't come from some high-end tuner shop, and it has a warranty.

Life is good my friends.

Only argument here Al is, if I wanted to drop a 100k on a car, I would get a non muscle car, that 625hp stang, whats the price tag..?