View Single Post
Old 09-23-2004, 10:07 PM   #12
PBodyGT87
Hot Liz, Cold Beer
 
PBodyGT87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 1,497
iTrader: (0)
So i voted for the fiero. Duh.

The MR2 beat the fiero in the quarter mile by about a second. So it's faster. (we have this on tape too if anyone wants to see this comparison.)

However if the fiero came with a turbo, it'd kill the MR2. The MR2 has help, and yes it's factory standard turbo, but if it didnt have that, it'd be a dog. Come on now, it's one second faster. BFD. Easy tweaking on the fiero could put it up to speed. You're comparing a turbo to a plain 2.8. That's just not fair. Pat, grow some balls and stick to domestics . You'd go import for a car one second faster? Psh. And for calling it a crappy 2.8, you're not getting a ride in it now. Unless you need some serious convining that the fiero is much cooler. Go ask some tart for a ride in his MR2 instead.
:P :finger:
__________________
*Creator of the esteemed "Buddy List" thread. (RIP)*
*Creator of the short-lived Ignore List Thread (RIP)*
1987 Pontiac Fiero GT- Stock 2.8 aluminum "boat anchor" Runs like a champ. Needs a chip now!

Also: 1974 Honda CB550/four. Ah, the OPEN-open road.
99 Saturn SW1. Flaunting a fender "blemish" (large gaping hole) thanks to a hit a run. Never caught the guy. Permanent Driveway Status at Justin's.
PBodyGT87 is offline   Reply With Quote