I think that is just the car, not including the driver - so 3600 to 3900lbs with a 200lb person?
With a 300hp turbo 4, the v6 makes less sense since it would have less TQ, even at 3.6L like the 5th gens and other GM cars have (and 320hp). Not to mention a lot more upside power than the V6 could ever have - isn't MB running a 345hp 2.0 in their top of the line AMG small sedan?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJSPEEDER
Wouldn't the 3400-3700 weight range make it similar to typically equipped 4th gens? That would be a nice step in the right direction.
Question about the 2.0 turbo, how much power will it have? Seems like 300 or more HP has become the standard for base model pony cars. Just wondering if they believe weight savings will make up the difference or if it will be at a price that would make people less likely to pick up a 6 cyl?
|
__________________
1984 Camaro: 350 Auto, Global West Suspension, Baer Brakes, CTW Wheels
1989 GTA: Bolt-on L98. Global West Suspension, full Magnaflow exhaust, Wilwood Brakes, CTW Wheels
|